Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34605947›Full record

Trial reportIntensive care medicine2021

Safety and tolerability of non-neutralizing adrenomedullin antibody adrecizumab (HAM8101) in septic shock patients: the AdrenOSS-2 phase 2a biomarker-guided trial.

Pierre-François Laterre, Peter Pickkers, Gernot Marx, Xavier Wittebole, Ferhat Meziani, Thierry Dugernier, Vincent Huberlant, Tobias Schuerholz, Bruno François, Jean-Baptiste Lascarrou and 18 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Intensive care medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Influence of adrenomedullin on the enzymatic activity of dipeptidyl peptidase 3Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2026
    Article
  7. [Pharmacological immunomodulation in sepsis].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026
    Review
  8. Observational
  9. Update on sepsis treatment.Journal of intensive care · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Adrenomedullin as an Immunomodulator of CD14Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2025
    Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 18 institutions in 5 countries.

Pierre-François Laterre *Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, (UCL Bruxelles), Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Peter Pickkers *Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Gernot Marx *Klinik fur Operative Intensivmedizin und Intermediate Care, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Xavier WitteboleCritical Care Department, Cliniques Universitaires St Luc, UC Louvain, Avenue Hipporcrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Ferhat MezianiFaculté de Médecine, Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Université de Strasbourg (UNISTRA), Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg, France.
Thierry DugernierClinique St. Pierre, Avenue Reine Fabiola 9, 1340, Ottignies, Belgium.
Vincent HuberlantIntensive Care, CH Jolimont, Hospitalier de Jolimont, Rue Ferrer 159, 7100, Haine Saint Paul, Belgium.
Tobias SchuerholzKlinik und Poliklinik fur Anaesthesiologie und Intensivtherapie, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Schillingallee 35, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
Bruno FrançoisRéanimation Polyvalente and Inserm CIC1435 & UMR1092, CHU de Limoges, France.
Jean-Baptiste LascarrouCHU de Nantes, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, 30 Bd. Jean Monnet, 44093, Nantes Cedex 1, France.
Albertus BeishuizenIntensive Care Center, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Koningsplein 1, 7512KZ, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Haikel OueslatiService d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Saint-Louis, 1 Avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75010, Paris, France.
Damien ContouCH Victor Dupouy, 69 Rue du Lieutenant-Colonel Prud'hon, 95107, Argenteuil Cedex, France.
Oscar HoitingCanisius-Wilhelmina-Ziekenhuis (CWZ), Weg door Jonkerbosch 100, 6532 SZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jean-Claude LacheradeCHD-Vendée, Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Boulevard Stéphane Moreau, 85000, La Roche-Sur-Yon, France.
Benjamin ChoustermanUniversité de Paris, U942 Inserm, MASCOT, Hôpitaux Universitaires Saint-Louis- Lariboisière, Fernand-Widal, 2, rue Ambroise-Paré, 75475, Paris Cedex 10, France.
Julien PottecherFédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation & Médecine Péri-Opératoire-Université de Strasbourg, EA3072, Strasbourg, France.
Michael BauerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Thomas GodetDépartement Anesthésie et Réanimation, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Pôle de Médecine Péri-opératoire, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Mahir KarakasDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Julie HelmsFaculté de Médecine, Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Université de Strasbourg (UNISTRA), Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg, France.
Andreas BergmannAdrenomed AG, Neuendorfstr. 15a, 16761, Hennigsdorf, Germany.
Jens ZimmermannAdrenomed AG, Neuendorfstr. 15a, 16761, Hennigsdorf, Germany.
Kathleen RichterAdrenomed AG, Neuendorfstr. 15a, 16761, Hennigsdorf, Germany.
Oliver HartmannAdrenomed AG, Neuendorfstr. 15a, 16761, Hennigsdorf, Germany.
Melanie ParsAdrenomed AG, Neuendorfstr. 15a, 16761, Hennigsdorf, Germany.
Alexandre MebazaaUniversité de Paris, U942 Inserm, MASCOT, APHP, Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire PROMICE, Hôpitaux Universitaires Saint-Louis-Lariboisière, Fernand-Widal, 2, Rue Ambroise-Paré, 75475, Paris Cedex 10, France. alexandre.mebazaa@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8715-7753
AdrenOSS-2 study participants
Inserm · FRCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEHôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand · FRCanisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis · NLCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRCentre Hospitalier Victor Dupouy · FRClinique Saint Pierre · BEHôpital de Jolimont · BEHôpital Lariboisière · FRHôpital Saint-Louis · FRJena University Hospital · DEMedisch Spectrum Twente · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLRoche (France) · FRUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversitätsklinikum Aachen · DEUniversitätsmedizin Rostock · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInvestigate safety and tolerability of adrecizumab, a humanized monoclonal adrenomedullin antibody, in septic shock patients with high adrenomedullin.

methodsPhase-2a, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled biomarker-guided trial with a single infusion of adrecizumab (2 or 4 mg/kg b.w.) compared to placebo. Patients with adrenomedullin above 70 pg/mL, < 12 h of vasopressor start for septic shock were eligible. Randomization was 1:1:2. Primary safety (90-day mortality, treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE)) and tolerability (drug interruption, hemodynamics) endpoints were recorded. Efficacy endpoints included the Sepsis Support Index (SSI, reflecting ventilator- and shock-free days alive), change in Sequential-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and 28-day mortality.

results301 patients were enrolled (median time of 8.5 h after vasopressor start). Adrecizumab was well tolerated (one interruption, no hemodynamic alteration) with no differences in frequency and severity in TEAEs between treatment arms (TEAE of grade 3 or higher: 70.5% in the adrecizumab group and 71.1% in the placebo group) nor in 90-day mortality. Difference in change in SSI between adrecizumab and placebo was 0.72 (CI -1.93-0.49, p = 0.24). Among various secondary endpoints, delta SOFA score (defined as maximum versus minimum SOFA) was more pronounced in the adrecizumab combined group compared to placebo [difference at 0.76 (95% CI 0.18-1.35); p = 0.007]. 28-day mortality in the adrecizumab group was 23.9% and 27.7% in placebo with a hazard ratio of 0.84 (95% confidence interval 0.53-1.31, log-rank p = 0.44).

conclusionsOverall, we successfully completed a randomized trial evaluating selecting patients for enrolment who had a disease-related biomarker. There were no overt signals of harm with using two doses of the adrenomedullin antibody adrecizumab; however, further randomized controlled trials are required to confirm efficacy and safety of this agent in septic shock patients.

Indexed as

AdrenomedullinShock, SepticAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBiomarkersDouble-Blind MethodHumansTreatment OutcomeAdrenomedullinAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBiomarkersenibarcimabAdrecizumab (HAM8101)AdrenomedullinEndothelial functionEnibarcimabSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID34605947
PMCPMC8487806
OpenAlexW3203725826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.