ArticleJAMA neurology2021
Association of Enzyme-Inducing Antiseizure Drug Use With Long-term Cardiovascular Disease.
Article in JAMA neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiovascular events and mortality in adults with late onset seizures: Focus on enzyme-modulating antiseizure medications.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- Epilepsy and incident cardiovascular disease: A prospective UK Biobank cohort study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Is Cardiovascular Mortality Among People with Epilepsy increasing? A retrospective US population study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Epilepsy Care in the Real World of Multiple Medical Considerations.Epilepsy currents · 2025Review
- Comparative risk of major health events among individuals prescribed different antiseizure medications following ischemic stroke.Epilepsia · 2025Article
- Epilepsy-heart syndrome: Concept, clinical context, and opportunity for integrated care.Epilepsia · 2025Article
- Cardiovascular Effects of Antiseizure Medications for Epilepsy.CNS drugs · 2025Review
- Antiseizure medications and their differing effects on cardiovascular risk.Epilepsy & behavior reports · 2025Review
- Cardiac Conduction Delay for Sodium Channel Antagonist Antiseizure Medications: An Analysis of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.Neurology · 2025Article
- Epilepsy and brain health: a large prospective cohort study.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- Cilostazol geno-protective effects mitigate carbamazepine-induced genotoxicity in human cultured blood lymphocytes.Toxicology reports · 2024Article
- [Discontinuation of antiseizure medication in patients with epilepsy].Der Nervenarzt · 2024Review
- Antiseizure Medications and Cardiovascular Events in Older People With Epilepsy in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.JAMA neurology · 2024Article
- Practices in the prescription of antiseizure medications: is it time to change?Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2024Article
- Article
- Review
- Epilepsy and the risk of adverse cardiovascular events: A nationwide cohort study.European journal of neurology · 2024Article
- The Epileptic Heart Syndrome: Epidemiology, pathophysiology and clinical detection.Epilepsy & behavior reports · 2024Article
- Temporal trends, in-hospital outcomes, and risk factors of acute myocardial infarction among patients with epilepsy in the United States: a retrospective national database analysis from 2008 to 2017.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- The epileptic heart: Cardiac comorbidities and complications of epilepsy. Atrial and ventricular structure and function by echocardiography in individuals with epilepsy - From clinical implications to individualized assessment.Epilepsy & behavior reports · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Enzyme-inducing antiseizure medications (eiASMs) have been hypothesized to be associated with long-term risks of cardiovascular disease. Objective: To quantify and model the putative hazard of cardiovascular disease secondary to eiASM use. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study covered January 1990 to March 2019 (median [IQR] follow-up, 9 [4-15], years). The study linked primary care and hospital electronic health records at National Health Service hospitals in England. People aged 18 years or older diagnosed as having epilepsy after January 1, 1990, were included. All eligible patients were included with a waiver of consent. No patients were approached who withdrew consent. Analysis began January 2021 and ended August 2021. Exposures: Receipt of 4 consecutive eiASMs (carbamazepine, eslicarbazepine, oxcarbazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone, rufinamide, or topiramate) following an adult-onset (age ≥18 years) epilepsy diagnosis or repeated exposure in a weighted cumulative exposure model. Main Outcomes and Measures: Three cohorts were isolated, 1 of which comprised all adults meeting a case definition for epilepsy diagnosed after 1990, 1 comprised incident cases diagnosed after 1998 (hospital linkage date), and 1 was limited to adults diagnosed with epilepsy at 65 years or older. Outcome was incident cardiovascular disease (ischemic heart disease or ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke). Hazard of incident cardiovascular disease was evaluated using adjusted propensity-matched survival analyses and weighted cumulative exposure models. Results: Of 10 916 166 adults, 50 888 (0.6%) were identified as having period-prevalent cases (median [IQR] age, 32 [19-50] years; 16 584 [53%] female), of whom 31 479 (62%) were diagnosed on or after 1990 and were free of cardiovascular disease at baseline. In a propensity-matched Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for age, sex, baseline socioeconomic status, and cardiovascular risk factors, the hazard ratio for incident cardiovascular disease was 1.21 (95% CI, 1.06-1.39) for those receiving eiASMs. The absolute difference in cumulative hazard diverges by more than 1% and greater after 10 years. For those with persistent exposure beyond 4 prescriptions, the median hazard ratio increased from amedian (IQR) of 1.54 (1.28-1.79) when taking a relative defined daily dose of an eiASM of 1 to 2.38 (1.52-3.56) with a relative defined daily dose of 2 throughout a maximum of 25 years' follow-up compared with those not receiving an eiASM. The hazard was elevated but attenuated when restricting analyses to incident cases or those diagnosed when older than 65 years. Conclusions and Relevance: The hazard of incident cardiovascular disease is higher in those receiving eiASMs. The association is dose dependent and the absolute difference in hazard seems to reach clinical significance by approximately 10 years from first exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.