Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34605849›Full record

ArticleJAMA internal medicine2021

Association of Statin Therapy Initiation With Diabetes Progression: A Retrospective Matched-Cohort Study.

Ishak A Mansi, Matthieu Chansard, Ildiko Lingvay, Song Zhang, Ethan A Halm, Carlos A Alvarez

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed
22.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 142 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. HDL metabolism and function in diabetes mellitus.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ishak A MansiDepartment of Medicine, VA North Texas Health Care System, Dallas.
Matthieu ChansardDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
Ildiko LingvayDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
Song ZhangDepartment of Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
Ethan A HalmDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
Carlos A AlvarezDepartment of Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Statin therapy has been associated with increased insulin resistance; however, its clinical implications for diabetes control among patients with diabetes is unknown. Objective: To assess diabetes progression after initiation of statin use in patients with diabetes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a retrospective matched-cohort study using new-user and active-comparator designs to assess associations between statin initiation and diabetes progression in a national cohort of patients covered by the US Department of Veterans Affairs from fiscal years 2003-2015. Patients included were 30 years or older; had been diagnosed with diabetes during the study period; and were regular users of the Veterans Affairs health system, with records of demographic information, clinical encounters, vital signs, laboratory data, and medication usage. Interventions: Treatment initiation with statins (statin users) or with H2-blockers or proton pump inhibitors (active comparators). Main Outcomes and Measures: Diabetes progression composite outcome comprised the following: new insulin initiation, increase in the number of glucose-lowering medication classes, incidence of 5 or more measurements of blood glucose of 200 mg/dL or greater, or a new diagnosis of ketoacidosis or uncontrolled diabetes. Results: From the 705 774 eligible patients, we matched 83 022 pairs of statin users and active comparators; the matched cohort had a mean (SD) age of 60.1 (11.6) years; 78 712 (94.9%) were men; 1715 (2.1%) were American Indian/Pacific Islander/Alaska Native, 570 (0.8%) were Asian, 17 890 (21.5%) were Black, and 56 633 (68.2 %) were White individuals. Diabetes progression outcome occurred in 55.9% of statin users vs 48.0% of active comparators (odds ratio, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.35-1.40; P < .001). Each individual component of the composite outcome was significantly higher among statin users. Secondary analysis demonstrated a dose-response relationship with a higher intensity of low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol lowering associated with greater diabetes progression. Conclusions and Relevance: This retrospective matched-cohort study found that statin use was associated with diabetes progression, including greater likelihood of insulin treatment initiation, significant hyperglycemia, acute glycemic complications, and an increased number of prescriptions for glucose-lowering medication classes. The risk-benefit ratio of statin use in patients with diabetes should take into consideration its metabolic effects.

Indexed as

VeteransBlood GlucoseCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes MellitusDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesBlood GlucoseHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID34605849
PMCPMC8491130
OpenAlexW3203433276

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.