Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34605699›Full record

ArticleHealth education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education2022

Evaluation of Afterschool Activity Programs' (ASAP) Effect on Children's Physical Activity, Physical Health, and Fundamental Movement Skills.

Mitchell Crozier, Niko S Wasenius, Kathryn M Denize, Danilo F da Silva, Taniya S Nagpal, Kristi B Adamo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mitchell CrozierUniversity of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4007-8366
Niko S WaseniusUniversity of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Kathryn M DenizeUniversity of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Danilo F da SilvaUniversity of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Taniya S NagpalUniversity of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Kristi B AdamoUniversity of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
University of Ottawa · CAUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysical literacy-focused afterschool activity programs (ASAPs) can be an effective strategy to improve children's health-related parameters. We sought to compare physical activity, body composition, aerobic capacity, and fundamental movement skills between physical literacy-focused ASAP and a standard recreational ASAP.

methodA pre-post (6 months) comparison study was conducted in 5- to 12-year-old children in a physical literacy-focused ASAP (physical literacy group,

resultsThere were no significant differences between groups at baseline. After 6 months, the physical literacy group exhibited a significant improvement in their total raw score for the Test of Gross Motor Development-2 (

conclusionsEngagement in the physical literacy-focused ASAP contributed to an attenuated increase in adiposity and an improvement in object control skills.

Indexed as

ExerciseMotor SkillsAccelerometryBody Mass IndexChildChild, PreschoolHumansLiteracyafter-school programmingchildren’s healthfundamental movement skillsphysical activityphysical literacy

Identifiers

PMID34605699
PMCPMC8892040
OpenAlexW3203620735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.