Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34605667›Full record

ArticleCBE life sciences education2021

Investigating Student Perceptions of Instructor Talk: Alignment with Researchers' Categorizations and Analysis of Remembered Language.

Dax Ovid, Mallory M Rice, Joshua Vargas Luna, Karen Tabayoyong, Parinaz Lajevardi, Kimberly D Tanner

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CBE life sciences education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dax OvidDepartment of Biology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94132.
Mallory M RiceDepartment of Biological Sciences, California State University San Marcos, San Marcos, CA 92096.
Joshua Vargas LunaDepartment of Biology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94132.
Karen TabayoyongDepartment of Biology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94132.
Parinaz LajevardiDepartment of Biology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94132.
Kimberly D TannerDepartment of Biology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94132.
San Francisco State University · USCalifornia State University, San Marcos · US

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Instructor Talk-the noncontent language used by an instructor during class time-is likely to influence learning environments in science classrooms from the student perspective. Despite Instructor Talk being found in every science course thus far, investigations into student perceptions and memories of it are limited. We investigated to what extent undergraduate biology students 1) were aligned with researchers in their perceptions of Instructor Talk as Positively Phrased or Negatively Phrased and 2) remembered Instructor Talk. To test these ideas, we engaged 90 biology students in a multipart assessment. First, students were given randomly selected Instructor Talk quotes, half Positively Phrased and half Negatively Phrased, and were asked to evaluate each quote as promoting a positive or negative learning environment. Overall, students evaluated the Instructor Talk quotes similarly to researchers' categorizations (

Indexed as

LanguageStudentsFacultyHumansPerceptionProblem-Based Learning

Identifiers

PMID34605667
PMCPMC8715771
OpenAlexW3203756308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.