Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34605428›Full record

ArticleActa crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology2021

eSPC: an online data-analysis platform for molecular biophysics.

Osvaldo Burastero, Stephan Niebling, Lucas A Defelipe, Christian Günther, Angelica Struve, Maria M Garcia Alai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. In Situ Online Spectroscopy and Light Scattering Techniques.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. TrkA ofMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. mBio · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Osvaldo BurasteroDepartamento de Química Biológica, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Intendente Güiraldes 2620, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0003-4089-0434
Stephan NieblingEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, EMBL Hamburg, Notkestrasse 85, 22607 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6582-5984
Lucas A DefelipeEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, EMBL Hamburg, Notkestrasse 85, 22607 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7859-7300
Christian GüntherEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, EMBL Hamburg, Notkestrasse 85, 22607 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6648-2055
Angelica StruveEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, EMBL Hamburg, Notkestrasse 85, 22607 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1134-7152
Maria M Garcia AlaiEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, EMBL Hamburg, Notkestrasse 85, 22607 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5200-7816

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 664726
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All biological processes rely on the formation of protein-ligand, protein-peptide and protein-protein complexes. Studying the affinity, kinetics and thermodynamics of binding between these pairs is critical for understanding basic cellular mechanisms. Many different technologies have been designed for probing interactions between biomolecules, each based on measuring different signals (fluorescence, heat, thermophoresis, scattering and interference, among others). Evaluation of the data from binding experiments and their fitting is an essential step towards the quantification of binding affinities. Here, user-friendly online tools to analyze biophysical data from steady-state fluorescence spectroscopy, microscale thermophoresis and differential scanning fluorimetry experiments are presented. The modules of the data-analysis platform (https://spc.embl-hamburg.de/) contain classical thermodynamic models and clear user guidelines for the determination of equilibrium dissociation constants (K

Indexed as

FluorescenceOnline SystemsTemperatureThermodynamicsCyclic GMP-Dependent Protein KinasesKineticsLigandsMycobacterium tuberculosisProtein BindingSpectrometry, FluorescenceCyclic GMP-Dependent Protein KinasesLigandsbinding affinitydifferential scanning fluorimetryeSPCKdligand screeningmicroscale thermophoresismolecular biophysicsmolecular interactionsonline serversopen scienceprotein stabilityTm

Identifiers

PMID34605428
PMCPMC8489228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.