Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34605224›Full record

ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2021

Between-study differences in grip strength: a comparison of Norwegian and Russian adults aged 40-69 years.

Rachel Cooper, Vladimir M Shkolnikov, Alexander V Kudryavtsev, Sofia Malyutina, Andrew Ryabikov, Laila Arnesdatter Hopstock, Jonas Johansson, Sarah Cook, David A Leon, Bjørn Heine Strand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rachel CooperDepartment of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Musculoskeletal Science and Sports Medicine Research Centre, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3370-5720
Vladimir M ShkolnikovInternational Laboratory for Population and Health, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-2259-5423
Alexander V KudryavtsevNorthern State Medical University, Arkhangelsk, Russian Federation.
Sofia MalyutinaResearch Institute of Internal and Preventive Medicine, Branch of Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Andrew RyabikovResearch Institute of Internal and Preventive Medicine, Branch of Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Laila Arnesdatter HopstockDepartment of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0072-7421
Jonas JohanssonDepartment of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Sarah CookFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
David A LeonInternational Laboratory for Population and Health, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-9747-1762
Bjørn Heine StrandNorwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4385-8886

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 100217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying individuals with low grip strength is an initial step in many operational definitions of sarcopenia. As evidence indicates that contemporaneous Russian populations may have lower mean levels of grip strength than other populations in northern Europe, we aimed to: compare grip strength in Russian and Norwegian populations by age and sex; investigate whether height, body mass index, education, smoking status, alcohol use and health status explain observed differences and; examine implications for case-finding low muscle strength.

methodsWe used harmonized cross-sectional data on grip strength and covariates for participants aged 40-69 years from the Russian Know Your Heart study (KYH) (n = 3833) and the seventh survey of the Norwegian Tromsø Study (n = 5598). Maximum grip strength (kg) was assessed using the same protocol and device in both studies. Grip strength by age, sex and study was modelled using linear regression and between-study differences were predicted from these models. Sex-specific age-standardized differences in grip strength and in prevalence of low muscle strength were estimated using the European population standard of 2013.

resultsNormal ranges of maximum grip strength in both studies combined were 33.8 to 67.0 kg in men and 18.7 to 40.1 kg in women. Mean grip strength was higher among Tromsø than KYH study participants and this difference did not vary markedly by age or sex. Adjustment for covariates, most notably height, attenuated between-study differences but these differences were still evident at younger ages. For example, estimated between-study differences in mean grip strength in fully adjusted models were 2.2 kg [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4, 3.1] at 40 years and 1.0 kg (95% CI 0.5, 1.5) at 65 years in men (age × study interaction P = 0.09) and 1.1 kg (95% CI 0.4, 1.9) at age 40 years and -0.2 kg (95% CI -0.7, 0.3) at 65 years in women (age × study interaction P < 0.01).

conclusionsWe found between-study differences in mean grip strength that are likely to translate into greater future risk of sarcopenia and poorer prospects of healthy ageing for Russian than Norwegian study participants. For example, the average Russian participant had a similar level of grip strength to a Norwegian participant 7 years older. Our findings suggest these differences may have their origins in childhood highlighting the need to consider interventions in early life to prevent sarcopenia.

Indexed as

Hand StrengthSarcopeniaAdultAgedBody Mass IndexCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMuscle StrengthBetween-country differencesBody sizeGrip strengthLifestyleSarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID34605224
PMCPMC8718040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.