Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34605194›Full record

ArticleObesity (Silver Spring, Md.)2021

From the clinic to the community: Can health system data accurately estimate population obesity prevalence?

Stephen J Mooney, Lin Song, Adam Drewnowski, James Buskiewicz, Sean D Mooney, Brian E Saelens, David E Arterburn

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Geospatial divide in real-world EHR data: Analytical workflow to assess regional biases and potential impact on health equity.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen J MooneyDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9092-938X
Lin SongSeattle-King County Public Health, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Adam DrewnowskiDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2892-9888
James BuskiewiczDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7919-7103
Sean D MooneyDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2654-0833
Brian E SaelensSeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6998-6339
David E ArterburnKaiser Permanente Washington Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5208-8492
University of Washington · USPublic Health – Seattle & King County · USKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · USKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · US

Funding

The Automatic Context Measurement Tool: bringing environmental data to non-specialistsR00LM012868 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MOONEY, STEPHEN JOHN · 2019 to 2021
$687k
NLM NIH HHS R00 LM012868
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveHealth system data were assessed for how well they can estimate obesity prevalence in census tracts.

methodsClinical visit data were available from two large health systems (Kaiser Permanente Washington and University of Washington Medicine) in King County, Washington, as were census tract-level obesity prevalence estimates from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). The health system data were geocoded to identify each patient's tract of residence, and the cross-sectional concordance between census tract-level obesity prevalence estimates computed from the two health systems in 2005 to 2006 and the concordance between University of Washington Medicine and BRFSS from 2012 to 2016 were assessed.

resultsThe spatial distribution of obesity was similar between the health systems (Spearman r = 0.63). The University of Washington Medicine estimates of rank order correlated well with BRFSS estimates (Spearman r = 0.85), though prevalence estimates from BRFSS were lower (mean obesity prevalence = 26% for University of Washington Medicine versus 20% for BRFSS, Wilcoxon rank sum test p < 0.001). Across all data sources, obesity was more prevalent in tracts with less educational attainment.

conclusionsHealth system clinical weight data can reliably replicate census tract-level spatial patterns in the ranking of obesity prevalence. Health system data may be an efficient resource for geographic obesity surveillance.

Indexed as

Census TractObesityBehavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPrevalenceUnited States

Identifiers

PMID34605194
PMCPMC8571026
OpenAlexW3202852333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.