Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34605174›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2021

Association between HIV PrEP indications and use in a national sexual network study of US men who have sex with men.

Kevin M Weiss, Pragati Prasad, Travis Sanchez, Steven M Goodreau, Samuel M Jenness

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. An Evidence-Based Approach to Facilitating PrEP Initiation Among YMSM: The MyPEEPS Plus mHealth and E-Peer Navigation Intervention.AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kevin M WeissDepartment of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Pragati PrasadDepartment of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Travis SanchezDepartment of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Steven M GoodreauDepartment of Anthropology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Samuel M JennessDepartment of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8840-105X
Emory University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Scientific/Technical CoreP2CHD042828 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SARA R. CURRAN · 2017 to 2026
$6.3M
EpiModel 2.0: Integrated Network Models for HIV/STI Prevention ScienceR01AI138783 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JENNESS, SAMUEL · 2018 to 2021
$3.0M
Modeling Antiretroviral-Based Prevention among MSM in the USR21MH112449 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JENNESS, SAMUEL · 2017 to 2018
$442k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI138783NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042828NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH112449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is effective in preventing HIV transmission. United States Public Health Service (USPHS) clinical practice guidelines define biobehavioral indications for initiation. To assess guideline implementation, it is critical to quantify PrEP nonusers who are indicated and PrEP users who are not indicated. We sought to estimate current PrEP use among US men who have sex with men (MSM), characterize whether their PrEP use aligned with their current indications for PrEP, and assess whether the association between PrEP indications and PrEP use differed by demography or geography.

methodsUsing data from a US web-based sexual network study of MSM between 2017 and 2019, we measured PrEP usage and assessed whether respondents met indications for PrEP. Log-binomial regression was used to estimate the relationship between PrEP indications and PrEP use, with adjustment for geography, age and race/ethnicity.

resultsOf 3508 sexually active, HIV-negative MSM, 34% met indications for PrEP. The proportion with current PrEP use was 32% among MSM meeting indications and 11% among those without indications. Nearly 40% of those currently using PrEP did not meet indications for PrEP, and 68% of MSM with indications for PrEP were not currently using PrEP. After adjusting for geography and demographics, MSM with PrEP indications were about three times as likely to be currently using PrEP. This association varied slightly, but not significantly, by geographic region, age and race/ethnicity.

conclusionsIndications for PrEP strongly predicted current PrEP use among US MSM. However, we identified substantial misalignment between indications and use in both directions (indicated MSM who were not benefitting from PrEP, and MSM taking PrEP while not presently being indicated). PrEP underuse by those at greatest risk for HIV acquisition may limit the projected impact of PrEP implementation, despite reported increases in PrEP provision. This calls for further implementation efforts to improve PrEP delivery to those most in need during periods of elevated sexual risk and to close the gap between indications and uptake.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisSexual and Gender MinoritiesHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleSexual BehaviorUnited StatesHIVmen who have sex with menpre-exposure prophylaxisprevention

Identifiers

PMID34605174
PMCPMC8488229
OpenAlexW3204134642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.