ArticleRespirology (Carlton, Vic.)2021
The impact of COVID-19 on acute non-invasive ventilation services: A case for change.
Article in Respirology (Carlton, Vic.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contemporary Concise Review 2021: COVID-19 and other respiratory infections.Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2022Review
- A human factors approach to quality improvement in oxygen prescribing.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2022Article
- The impact of COVID-19 on acute non-invasive ventilation services: A case for change.Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2021Article
- Digital healthcare in COPD management: a narrative review on the advantages, pitfalls, and need for further research.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseReview
- The benefits of a home non-invasive ventilation retrieval service: Improved effectiveness and environmental sustainability in challenging times.Chronic respiratory diseaseArticle
- Predicting in-hospital mortality in a real-world population of ward-based non-invasive ventilation in acute COPD exacerbations.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseObservational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.