Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34604941›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2022

Development of a genetic algorithm and NONMEM workbench for automating and improving population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model selection.

Mohamed Ismail, Mark Sale, Yifan Yu, Nikhil Pillai, Sihang Liu, Beth Pflug, Robert Bies

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. A fully automatic tool for development of population pharmacokinetic models.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Parameter grouping and co-estimation in physiologically based kinetic models using genetic algorithms.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Go beyond the limits of genetic algorithm in daily covariate selection practice.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mohamed IsmailDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Mark SaleNuventra Pharma Sciences, Durham, NC, USA.
Yifan YuDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Nikhil PillaiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Sihang LiuDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Beth PflugRoswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Robert BiesDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA. robertbi@buffalo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3818-2252

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current approach to selection of a population PK/PD model is inherently flawed as it fails to account for interactions between structural, covariate, and statistical parameters. Further, the current approach requires significant manual and redundant model modifications that heavily lend themselves to automation. Within the discipline of numerical optimization it falls into the "local search" category. Genetic algorithms are a class of algorithms inspired by the mathematics of evolution. GAs are general, powerful, robust algorithms and can be used to find global optimal solutions for difficult problems even in the presence of non-differentiable functions, as is the case in the discrete nature of including/excluding model components in search of the best performing mixed-effects PK/PD model. A genetic algorithm implemented in an R-based NONMEM workbench for identification of near optimal models is presented. In addition to the GA capabilities, the workbench supports modeling efforts by: (1) Organizing and displaying models in tabular format, allowing the user to sort, filter, edit, create, and delete models seamlessly, (2) displaying run results, parameter estimates and precisions, (3) integrating xpose4 and PsN to facilitate generation of model diagnostic plots and run PsN scripts, (4) running regression models between post-hoc parameter estimates and covariates. This approach will further facilitate the scientist to shift efforts to focus on model evaluation, hypotheses generation, and interpretation and applications of resulting models.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsPharmacokineticsComputer SimulationModels, BiologicalAutomationGenetic algorithmMachine learningNONMEMPopulation pharmacokinetics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.