Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34604794›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Rheumatology2021

The impact of autoantibodies against citrullinated, carbamylated, and acetylated peptides on radiographic progression in patients with new-onset rheumatoid arthritis: an observational cohort study.

Jagtar S Nijjar, Fraser R Morton, Holger Bang, Christopher D Buckley, Désirée van der Heijde, Ashley Gilmour, Caron Paterson, Iain B McInnes, Duncan Porter, Karim Raza and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Laser-Induced Periodic Phase-Transition of 2D-MoTeAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Jagtar S NijjarDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Fraser R MortonResearch into Inflammatory Arthritis Centre Versus Arthritis, Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Holger BangOrgentec Diagnostika, Mainz, Germany.
Christopher D BuckleyRheumatology Research Group, Institute for Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Désirée van der HeijdeDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands.
Ashley GilmourResearch into Inflammatory Arthritis Centre Versus Arthritis, Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Caron PatersonResearch into Inflammatory Arthritis Centre Versus Arthritis, Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Iain B McInnesResearch into Inflammatory Arthritis Centre Versus Arthritis, Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Duncan PorterDepartment of Rheumatology, Gartnavel General Hospital, National Health Service Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
Karim RazaResearch into Inflammatory Arthritis Centre Versus Arthritis and MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Scottish Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Inception Cohort Investigators
University of Glasgow · GBVersus Arthritis · GBLeiden University Medical Center · NLNational Health Service · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office ETM/40Medical Research Council MR/P021220/1Versus Arthritis 22253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA range of anti-modified protein antibodies (AMPAs) are associated with rheumatoid arthritis. We aimed to assess the relationship between AMPA profiles and radiographic progression in patients with new-onset rheumatoid arthritis.

methodsIn this cohort study, we obtained samples and data from the Scottish Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (SERA) inception cohort and biobank, which recruited patients with new-onset rheumatoid arthritis or undifferentiated arthritis who had at least one swollen joint from 20 hospitals across Scotland. AMPAs in plasma samples were measured by ELISAs at baseline. Paired radiographs of the hands and feet were taken at baseline and at 1 year and were scored with the Sharp-van der Heijde (SvH) method. We calculated differences in radiographic progression using estimated marginal mean changes between baseline and 1 year, with the baseline values of radiographic variables, rheumatoid factor, sex, age at recruitment, symptom duration, and Disease Activity Score 28 with C-reactive protein included as covariates.

findingsBetween March 1, 2011, and April, 30, 2015, 1073 patients were recruited to the SERA study. 362 patients with rheumatoid arthritis were included in our study and had their AMPA profiles determined. Patients were grouped into four main autoantibody profiles by reactivities to post-translational modifications: single positivity for anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPAs; 73 [20%]); double positivity for ACPAs and anti-acetylated peptide antibodies (AAPAs; 45 [12%]); triple positivity for ACPAs, AAPAs, and anti-carbamylated peptide antibodies (151 [42%]); and AMPA negativity (74 [20%]). 19 (5%) patients were in one of the minor autoantibody groups. Of the 233 patients with both antibody data and radiographs of sufficient quality, triple-positive patients had more radiographic progression between baseline and 12 months (estimated mean change in total SvH score 1·8, 95% CI 0·9-2·6, SE 0·4) than did single-positive patients (0·5, 0·1-1·0, 0·2; estimated mean difference in the total change in SvH score 1·2, 95% CI 0·1-2·4, SE 0·5). There was no difference in radiographic progression between single positive patients and AMPA negative patients (estimated mean change in total SvH score 0·7, 95% CI 0·1-1·4, SE 0·3; estimated mean difference in the total change in SvH score -0·2, 95% CI -1·1 to 0·7, SE 0·4).

interpretationThis study suggests that the optimal prediction of future rates of radiographic progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis will require an assessment of autoantibodies against multiple post-translationally modified proteins or peptides.

fundingThe EU FP7 HEALTH programme, the Scottish Translational Medicine Research Collaboration, and the Chief Scientist Office Scotland.

Identifiers

PMID34604794
PMCPMC7611758
OpenAlexW3124269249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.