Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34604793›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in structural biology2021

Hypervariability of accessible and inaccessible conformational space of proteins.

Ashraya Ravikumar, Narayanaswamy Srinivasan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in structural biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ashraya RavikumarMolecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, 560012, India.
Narayanaswamy SrinivasanMolecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, 560012, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteins undergo motions in a range of amplitudes, from domain motions to backbone rotations, leading to changes in (φ,ψ) torsion angles and small-scale bond vibrations and angle bending. Here, we study the extent of variations in (φ,ψ) values in proteins and the effects of bond geometry variations due to vibrational motions in a protein on the accessible, (steric clash-free) (φ,ψ) space. We perform 1-fs timestep unconstrained molecular dynamics simulations on super-high-resolution protein structures. Extent of variations in bond geometry during the simulation is within acceptable ranges of bond lengths and angles. However, the steric clash-free (φ,ψ) space continuously changes as seen in bond geometry-specific (φ,ψ) steric maps at the residue level during simulations. (φ,ψ) regions that have steric clash at one timepoint can become steric clash-free at a different timepoint through minor adjustments to backbone bond lengths and angles. Also instances of (φ,ψ) transitions from the left to right half of the (φ,ψ) map in consecutive snapshots of the trajectory are seen. Although the two quadrants are separated by a steric clash-prone region, corresponding to a high-energy barrier, height of this barrier is lowered by adjusting the bond geometry such that a bridging region of steric clash-free, low-energy (φ,ψ) values is formed. We demonstrate the idea of dynamically varying nature of acceptable and accessible (φ,ψ) steric space in proteins, which has implications for protein folding; proteins could sample (φ,ψ) space which is originally considered to be inaccessible, during folding, through minor adjustments to their backbone bond geometry.

Indexed as

Bond length and anglesMolecular dynamics simulationsProtein dynamicsProtein stereochemistryRamachandran map(φ,ψ) angle transitions

Identifiers

PMID34604793
PMCPMC8473459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.