ArticleCritical care explorations2021
A New Trick for an Old Dog: L-Epinephrine Delivered Continuously in the Vapor Phase.
Article in Critical care explorations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inhaled L-Epinephrine As a Rescue Therapy in Critical Bronchiolitis.Critical care explorations · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inhaled L-epinephrine is a known treatment of severe croup and postextubation upper airway obstruction. L-epinephrine can be delivered continuously in the vapor phase, but the indications, safety, and efficacy of this novel practice have yet to be evaluated. Theoretical risks are tachycardia, hypertension, and dysrhythmias. The study objective was to describe patient characteristics and vital sign changes related to continuous vaporized L-epinephrine use in critically ill children with the hypothesis that it can be practically and safely administered to children with subglottic edema and lower airway obstruction.
designRetrospective cohort study.
settingPICU and cardiothoracic ICU in a tertiary academic children's hospital. PATIENTS: Patients age 0-21 years treated with continuous vaporized L-epinephrine from 2013 to 2019.
interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsContinuous vaporized L-epinephrine was administered 140 times to 129 subjects via a high-flow nasal oxygen device. The median age was 10.6 months (1.3; interquartile range, 4.8-17.1 mo). The most common indications were lower respiratory tract obstruction (45%), postextubation subglottic edema (31%), and croup (16%). Eighty-eight percent had no escalation of respiratory support within 24 hours of initiation of continuous vaporized L-epinephrine, 5% progressed to require endotracheal intubation, and 3% were reintubated within 24 hours of initiation of continuous vaporized L-epinephrine following an extubation attempt. After starting continuous vaporized L-epinephrine, 85% of subjects had a decrease in heart rate and 80% had a decrease in respiratory rate. Six subjects had an increase in heart rate, and eight had an increase in blood pressure of more than 20% from baseline. These subjects did not receive interventions specific to these vital sign changes, including discontinuation of continuous vaporized L-epinephrine.
conclusionsContinuous vaporized L-epinephrine was safely administered to critically ill children with most subjects demonstrating a decrease in heart rate, blood pressure, and respiratory rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.