Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34604758›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2021

Real-time machine learning-based intensive care unit alarm classification without prior knowledge of the underlying rhythm.

Wan-Tai M Au-Yeung, Rahul K Sevakula, Ashish K Sahani, Mohamad Kassab, Richard Boyer, Eric M Isselbacher, Antonis A Armoundas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Diagnostic AI and Cardiac Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Wan-Tai M Au-YeungCardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13th St, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
Rahul K SevakulaCardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13th St, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
Ashish K SahaniCenter for Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Ropar, Rupnagar, Punjab 14001, India.
Mohamad KassabCardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13th St, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
Richard BoyerAnesthesia Department, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Eric M IsselbacherHealthcare Transformation Lab, Massachusetts General Hospital, 50 Staniford St, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Antonis A ArmoundasCardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13th St, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USIndian Institute of Technology Ropar · INMassachusetts Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Prevention and Treatment of Ventricular TachyarrhythmiasR01HL135335 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ARMOUNDAS, ANTONIS A · 2017 to 2020
$2.1M
A Medical-Grade Smart-Phone Based Monitoring System (Supplement)R21EB026164 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ARMOUNDAS, ANTONIS A · 2018 to 2020
$668k
Utility of Vagal Stimulation to Prevent the Onset of Ventricular ArrhythmiasR21HL137870 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ARMOUNDAS, ANTONIS A · 2017 to 2018
$468k
American Heart Association-American Stroke Association 19POST34450149NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL135335NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL137870NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB026164
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis work attempts to develop a standalone heart rhythm alerting system for the intensive care unit (ICU), where life-threatening arrhythmias have to be identified/alerted more precisely and more instantaneously (i.e. with lower latency) than existing bedside monitors. METHODS AND

resultsWe use the dataset from the PhysioNet 2015 Challenge, which contains records that led to true and false arrhythmic alarms in the ICU. These records have been re-annotated as one of eight classes, namely (i) asystole, (ii) extreme bradycardia, (iii) extreme tachycardia, (iv) ventricular fibrillation (VF), (v) ventricular tachycardia (VT), (vi) normal sinus rhythm, (vii) sinus tachycardia, and (viii) noise/artefacts. Arrhythmia-specific features and features that measure the signal quality were extracted from all the records. To improve VF detection, an improved, over an existing, single-lead R-wave detection was developed that takes into account the R-waves detected in all electrocardiographic (ECG) leads. To avoid false R-wave detection due to pacing spikes, ECG signals were filtered with a low pass filter prior to R-wave detection, while the raw signals were used for feature extraction. Random forest was used as the classifier, and 10-time five-fold cross-validation, resulted in a macro-average sensitivity of 81.54%.

conclusionsIn conclusion, comparing with the bedside monitors used in the PhysioNet 2015 competition, we find that our method achieves higher positive predictive values for asystole, extreme bradycardia, VT, and VF; furthermore, our method is able to alert the presence of arrhythmia instantaneously, i.e. up to 4 s earlier.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceBedside monitorsFeature engineeringMachine learningMulti-class classificationSignal processing

Identifiers

PMID34604758
PMCPMC8482048
OpenAlexW3180068077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.