ArticleJMIR infodemiology
A Public Health Research Agenda for Managing Infodemics: Methods and Results of the First WHO Infodemiology Conference.
Article in JMIR infodemiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Quality of web-based information about the coronavirus disease 2019: a rapid systematic review of infodemiology studies published during the first year of the pandemic.BMC public health · 2022Pooled it
- Intervening on Trust in Science to Reduce Belief in COVID-19 Misinformation and Increase COVID-19 Preventive Behavioral Intentions: Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Trial
- Mapping risk communication practices in public health emergencies: a scoping review and comparison with Italian regional pandemic plans.BMC public health · 2026Article
- How to communicate evidence against catchy erroneous arguments?European journal of public health · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a tool for detecting misinformation risk in diet, nutrition, and health content (Diet-MisRAT).Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A suite of large language models for public health infoveillance.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- How Do e-Nutrition Literacy and Faith Shape Positive Nutrition Attitudes? A Machine Learning Approach in Türkiye.Nutrients · 2026Article
- What can chatbot conversations reveal about vaccine concerns? An observational topic modelling study for public health infoveillance.BMJ digital health & AI · 2026Article
- Pandemic fatigue and associated factors: a meta-analysis using the COM-B model.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- Adoption of international good manufacturing practices in the Nigerian pharmaceutical industry: promising results from a decade of investment.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2026Review
- Diplomatic monocultures in public health diplomacy: a narrative review on conference equity, participation and visibility.Public health reviews · 2026Review
- A call for government-driven health promotion solutions surveillance in public health: Nests and networks.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2025Article
- Europe in a hybrid war: health security as strategic defence.European journal of public health · 2025Article
- Bridging the Infodemic Equity Gap: North-South Digital Health Disparities and a Framework for Action.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- U.S. trust in physicians as key public health messengers during the H5N1 avian influenza outbreak.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Infodemic Versus Viral Information Spread: Key Differences and Open Challenges.JMIR infodemiology · 2025Article
- Use of Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Model for COVID-19 Fact-Checking: Development and Usability Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Effects of the Modern Digital Information Environment on Maternal Health Care Professionals, the Role of Midwives, and the People in Their Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- PH-LLM: Public Health Large Language Models for Infoveillance.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Assessing the Saudi Ministry of Health Instagram messaging through the lens of the health belief model.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
72 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAn infodemic is an overflow of information of varying quality that surges across digital and physical environments during an acute public health event. It leads to confusion, risk-taking, and behaviors that can harm health and lead to erosion of trust in health authorities and public health responses. Owing to the global scale and high stakes of the health emergency, responding to the infodemic related to the pandemic is particularly urgent. Building on diverse research disciplines and expanding the discipline of infodemiology, more evidence-based interventions are needed to design infodemic management interventions and tools and implement them by health emergency responders.
objectiveThe World Health Organization organized the first global infodemiology conference, entirely online, during June and July 2020, with a follow-up process from August to October 2020, to review current multidisciplinary evidence, interventions, and practices that can be applied to the COVID-19 infodemic response. This resulted in the creation of a public health research agenda for managing infodemics.
methodsAs part of the conference, a structured expert judgment synthesis method was used to formulate a public health research agenda. A total of 110 participants represented diverse scientific disciplines from over 35 countries and global public health implementing partners. The conference used a laddered discussion sprint methodology by rotating participant teams, and a managed follow-up process was used to assemble a research agenda based on the discussion and structured expert feedback. This resulted in a five-workstream frame of the research agenda for infodemic management and 166 suggested research questions. The participants then ranked the questions for feasibility and expected public health impact. The expert consensus was summarized in a public health research agenda that included a list of priority research questions.
resultsThe public health research agenda for infodemic management has five workstreams: (1) measuring and continuously monitoring the impact of infodemics during health emergencies; (2) detecting signals and understanding the spread and risk of infodemics; (3) responding and deploying interventions that mitigate and protect against infodemics and their harmful effects; (4) evaluating infodemic interventions and strengthening the resilience of individuals and communities to infodemics; and (5) promoting the development, adaptation, and application of interventions and toolkits for infodemic management. Each workstream identifies research questions and highlights 49 high priority research questions.
conclusionsPublic health authorities need to develop, validate, implement, and adapt tools and interventions for managing infodemics in acute public health events in ways that are appropriate for their countries and contexts. Infodemiology provides a scientific foundation to make this possible. This research agenda proposes a structured framework for targeted investment for the scientific community, policy makers, implementing organizations, and other stakeholders to consider.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.