ReviewACS omega2021
Microfluidics-Integrated Sensors toward Rapid Detection of Single Nucleotide Variations.
Review in ACS omega, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Discrimination of Single-Nucleotide Variants Based on an Allele-Specific Hybridization Chain Reaction and Smartphone Detection.ACS sensors · 2022Article
- A Hybrid Microfluidic Electronic Sensing Platform for Life Science Applications.Micromachines · 2022Article
- Human mini brains and spinal cords in a dish: Modeling strategies, current challenges, and prospective advances.Journal of tissue engineeringReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid detection of single nucleotide variations (SNVs) is of critical importance to early diagnosis of several diseases and the prediction of diverse responses to a specific treatment. Based on the information published in the literature, discrimination of SNVs is a developing area of study with great research enthusiasm and is also an area that can benefit from microfluidics-integrated designs. This review provides a brief overview of different microfluidics-based strategies for rapid detection of SNVs and mismatched bases. Sensors based on various microfluidic formats, such as paper-based microfluidic biosensors, droplet-based microfluidic systems, and magnetic bead-based microfluidic biosensors, have been discussed with respect to their specific pros and cons for SNV detection. These systems have shown promise for distributed on-site diagnostics in personalized medicine.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.