Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34604587›Full record

ArticleJournal of preventive medicine and hygiene2021

Reach, accessibility and acceptance of different communication channels for health promotion: a community-based analysis in Odisha, India.

Jaya Singh Kshatri, Subrata Kumar Palo, Meely Panda, Subhashisa Swain, Rajeshwari Sinha, Pranab Mahapatra, Sanghamitra Pati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jaya Singh KshatriICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Department of Health Research, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Subrata Kumar PaloICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Department of Health Research, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Meely PandaAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India.
Subhashisa SwainSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Rajeshwari SinhaIndependent Researcher, New Delhi, India.
Pranab MahapatraDepartment of Psychiatry, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Sanghamitra PatiICMR-Regional Medical Research Centre, Department of Health Research, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo achieve universal health coverage, improving demand generation at community is necessary. Media plays an important role by acting as a linking pin between health service providers and the community. This study intended to assess the penetration and acceptability of various forms of media for health communication in Odisha, India.

methodsA cross-sectional mixed method study was conducted in 2016 in four districts. Following a desk review, a situational analysis was done at state, district and sub-district level. Data was collected through direct observation of study sites using a predefined checklist on knowledge awareness and practice, focussed group discussion and in-depth interviews using semi-structured questionnaire. Qualitative data was analyzed using framework approach while for quantitative data, we used SPSS 20.0.

resultsMajor identified media houses were television (TV), radio and newspaper. Many health programs were being broadcasted in regional TV channels of the state, whereas leading public radio channel broadcasted highest number of health programs almost daily. The major source for information on disease symptoms and prevention was television (63.6%), remove hyphen (36.6%), newspaper (21.6%), health facility/service providers (17.7%), radio (9.2%), and other media like posters, pamphlets and folk dance (5.5%). Information on disease treatment or management was received mostly from television (61.2%), poster/leaflets (39.2%), remove hyphen (35.2%) and newspaper (19.7%). Only 8% of people received any health related message in mobile in past one year. Boards and hoarding provided information to 16.5% of study population. Nearly 36% respondents got information from health-wall, which are used to promote health awareness through wall paintings, graffiti etc. For immunization related information, interpersonal communication through frontline health workers was the most preferred.

conclusionInterpersonal communication is believed to be most acceptable source of information on maternal and child health, immunization and neonatal care. For people with low literacy, remove hyphen campaign, folk media and interpersonal communication were found to be effective.

Indexed as

CommunicationHealth PromotionMass MediaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansIndiaInterpersonal RelationsHealth communicationHealth literacyInformation education and communicationInterpersonal communicationMedia

Identifiers

PMID34604587
PMCPMC8451355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.