ReviewHeliyon2021
Effects of sensory substituted functional training on balance, gait, and functional performance in neurological patient populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Heliyon, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Randomized controlled trial study of intelligent rehabilitation training system for functional ankle instability.Scientific reports · 2024Trial
- Review
- Review
- Article
- The future of sensory substitution, addition, and expansion via haptic devices.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSensory Substitution (SS) is the use of one sensory modality to supply environmental information normally gathered by another sense while still preserving key functions of the original sense.
objectiveThis systematic literature review and meta-analysis summarises and synthesise current evidence and data to estimate the effectiveness of SS supplemented training for improving balance, gait and functional performance in neurological patient populations.
methodsA systematic literature search was performed in Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using a SS training intervention were included.
resultsNine RCTs were included. Outcome measures/training paradigms were structured according to the balance framework of Shumway-Cook and Woollacott: Static steady-state, Dynamic steady-state and Proactive balance. Meta-analyses revealed significant overall effects of SS training for all three outcomes, as well as self-assessment and functional capacity outcomes, with Dynamic Steady-State balance and ability of stroke survivors to support bodyweight independently on paretic side lower limb found to have had the largest statistical and clinical effects. Meta-analyses also revealed non-significant retention effects.
conclusionThis review provides evidence in favour of a global positive effect of SS training in improving Static steady-state, Dynamic steady-state and Proactive balance measures, as well as measures of self-assessment and functional capacity in neurological patient populations. Retention of effects were not significant at follow-up assessments, although no intervention met training dosage recommendations. It is important for future research to consider variables such as specific patient population, sensor type, and training modalities in order identify the most effective type of training paradigms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.