Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34604553›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2021

Adaptive magnetic resonance-guided neurovascular-sparing radiotherapy for preservation of erectile function in prostate cancer patients.

Frederik R Teunissen, Ruud C Wortel, Jochem Hes, Thomas Willigenburg, Eline N de Groot-van Breugel, Johannes C J de Boer, Harm H E van Melick, Helena M Verkooijen, Jochem R N van der Voort van Zyp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. In response to Grivas et al.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Frederik R TeunissenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ruud C WortelDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jochem HesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Thomas WilligenburgDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Eline N de Groot-van BreugelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Johannes C J de BoerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Harm H E van MelickDepartment of Urology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Helena M VerkooijenImaging and Oncology Division, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jochem R N van der Voort van ZypDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeErectile dysfunction is a common adverse effect of external beam radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer (PCa), likely as a result of damage to neural and vascular tissue. Magnetic resonance-guided online adaptive radiotherapy (MRgRT) enables high-resolution MR imaging and paves the way for neurovascular-sparing approaches, potentially lowering erectile dysfunction after radiotherapy for PCa. The aim of this study was to assess the planning feasibility of neurovascular-sparing MRgRT for localized PCa. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwenty consecutive localized PCa patients, treated with standard 5×7.25 Gy MRgRT, were included. For these patients, neurovascular-sparing 5×7.25 Gy MRgRT plans were generated

resultsNeurovascular-sparing constraints for the CC, and PB were met in all 20 patients. For the IPA, constraints were met in 19 (95%) patients bilaterally and 1 (5%) patient unilaterally. Constraints for the NVB were met in 8 (40%) patients bilaterally, in 8 (40%) patients unilaterally, and were not met in 4 (20%) patients. NVB constraints were not met when gross tumor volume (GTV) was located dorsolaterally in the prostate. Dose to the NVB, IPA, and CC was significantly lower in the neurovascular-sparing plans.

conclusionsNeurovascular-sparing MRgRT for localized PCa is feasible in the planning setting. The extent of NVB sparing largely depends on the patient's GTV location in relation to the NVB.

Indexed as

Erectile dysfunctionErectile function sparingLocalized prostate cancerMRgRTMR-LinacNeurovascular-sparing

Identifiers

PMID34604553
PMCPMC8473534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.