Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34604507›Full record

ArticleTransplantation direct2021

Machine Learning Prediction of Liver Allograft Utilization From Deceased Organ Donors Using the National Donor Management Goals Registry.

Andrew M Bishara, Dmytro S Lituiev, Dieter Adelmann, Rishi P Kothari, Darren J Malinoski, Jacob D Nudel, Mitchell B Sally, Ryutaro Hirose, Dexter D Hadley, Claus U Niemann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation direct, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Fairly Predicting Graft Failure in Liver Transplant for Organ Assigning.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andrew M BisharaDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Dmytro S LituievBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Dieter AdelmannDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Rishi P KothariDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Darren J MalinoskiDivision of Trauma, Critical Care and Acute Care Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Jacob D NudelDepartment of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Mitchell B SallyDivision of Trauma, Critical Care and Acute Care Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Ryutaro HiroseDepartment of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Dexter D HadleyBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Claus U NiemannDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.

Funding

Comprehensive Anesthesia Research TrainingT32GM008440 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Judith Hellman · 1996 to 2026
$5.5M
Crowd-Assisted Deep Learning (CrADLe) Digital Curation to Translate Big Data into Precision MedicineU01LM012675 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA · PI HADLEY, DEXTER D · 2017 to 2020
$2.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008440NLM NIH HHS U01 LM012675
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early prediction of whether a liver allograft will be utilized for transplantation may allow better resource deployment during donor management and improve organ allocation. The national donor management goals (DMG) registry contains critical care data collected during donor management. We developed a machine learning model to predict transplantation of a liver graft based on data from the DMG registry.

methodsSeveral machine learning classifiers were trained to predict transplantation of a liver graft. We utilized 127 variables available in the DMG dataset. We included data from potential deceased organ donors between April 2012 and January 2019. The outcome was defined as liver recovery for transplantation in the operating room. The prediction was made based on data available 12-18 h after the time of authorization for transplantation. The data were randomly separated into training (60%), validation (20%), and test sets (20%). We compared the performance of our models to the Liver Discard Risk Index.

resultsOf 13 629 donors in the dataset, 9255 (68%) livers were recovered and transplanted, 1519 recovered but used for research or discarded, 2855 were not recovered. The optimized gradient boosting machine classifier achieved an area under the curve of the receiver operator characteristic of 0.84 on the test set, outperforming all other classifiers.

conclusionsThis model predicts successful liver recovery for transplantation in the operating room, using data available early during donor management. It performs favorably when compared to existing models. It may provide real-time decision support during organ donor management and transplant logistics.

Identifiers

PMID34604507
PMCPMC8478404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.