Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34604204›Full record

ArticleOcular oncology and pathology2021

Estrogen Receptor Is Expressed in Uveal Melanoma: A Potential Target for Therapy.

Lynn Schoenfield, Sarah Janse, David Kline, Mary E Aronow, Arun D Singh, Caroline Craven, Mohamed Abdel-Rahman, Colleen M Cebulla

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ocular oncology and pathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lynn SchoenfieldDepartment of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Sarah JanseCenter for Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
David KlineCenter for Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Mary E AronowRetina Service and Ocular Melanoma Center, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Arun D SinghCole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Caroline CravenDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Havener Eye Institute, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Mohamed Abdel-RahmanDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Havener Eye Institute, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Colleen M CebullaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Havener Eye Institute, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USCleveland Eye Clinic · USHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetastatic uveal melanoma (UM) has no effective treatment. To date, no publications have reported immunohistochemical evidence of estrogen receptors (ERs) in UM; however, changes in pathologic reporting for ER in breast carcinoma prompted a re-examination of ER in UM, as it could represent a potential therapeutic target.

objectiveTo determine if UM tumors express ER by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using current methodology for breast cancer and to evaluate ER gene expression using a publicly available UM database.

methodsA retrospective IHC analysis with clinical correlation was performed on 2 cohorts: 57 cases from the Cleveland Clinic (CC) and 50 from the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (OSUWMC). Analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas Project (TCGA) UM Dataset of 80 patients was also performed.

resultsPresence of ER was detected by IHC in 20 of 34 (59%) analyzable cases in the CC cohort. Of the 50 patients in the OSU cohort, 52 specimens from 47 patients were sufficient for analysis. Of these 47 cases, 29 (62%) had tumor that was ER positive in ≥1% nuclei. In the second cohort, positivity was classified as positive (≥10% nuclei, 34% cases) or low positive (1-9% nuclei, 28% cases). In 5 patients, there were paired samples, that is, primary tumor and subsequent recurrence or metastasis, with concordance for ER in 4 of 5 cases. In the TCGA database, elevated CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Potentially actionable ER expression is present in greater than half of UM cases by IHC. Gene expression of

Indexed as

Estrogen receptorsImmunohistochemistryPrognosisTreatmentUveal melanoma

Identifiers

PMID34604204
PMCPMC8443923
OpenAlexW3162762435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.