Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34604008›Full record

ArticleQatar medical journal2021

Fecal microbiota transplants: A review of emerging clinical data on applications, efficacy, and risks (2015-2020).

Dana Al-Ali, Aamena Ahmed, Ameena Shafiq, Clare McVeigh, Ali Chaari, Dalia Zakaria, Ghizlane Bendriss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Qatar medical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dana Al-AliPremedical Division Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Premedical Division, PO Box 24144 Doha, Qatar E-mail: ghb2002@qatar-med.cornell.edu.
Aamena AhmedNorthwestern University Qatar, Doha, Qatar.
Ameena ShafiqPremedical Division Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Premedical Division, PO Box 24144 Doha, Qatar E-mail: ghb2002@qatar-med.cornell.edu.
Clare McVeighPremedical Division Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Premedical Division, PO Box 24144 Doha, Qatar E-mail: ghb2002@qatar-med.cornell.edu.
Ali ChaariPremedical Division Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Premedical Division, PO Box 24144 Doha, Qatar E-mail: ghb2002@qatar-med.cornell.edu.
Dalia ZakariaPremedical Division Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Premedical Division, PO Box 24144 Doha, Qatar E-mail: ghb2002@qatar-med.cornell.edu.
Ghizlane BendrissPremedical Division Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Premedical Division, PO Box 24144 Doha, Qatar E-mail: ghb2002@qatar-med.cornell.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the importance of the gut microbiota in health and disease is a subject of growing interest, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) was suggested as an attractive therapeutic strategy to restore homeostasis of the gut microbiota, thereby treating diseases that were associated with alteration of the gut microbiota. FMT involves the administration of fresh, frozen, or dried fecal microorganisms from the gut of a healthy donor into the intestinal tract of a patient. This rediscovery of the potential benefits of an ancient practice was accompanied by a rapid progression of our understanding of the roles and mechanisms of gut microbes in the pathogenesis of disease. With a growing number of diseases being associated with dysbiosis or the alteration of gut microbiota, FMT was suggested as an attractive therapeutic strategy to "reset the gut" and initiate clinical resolutions or remissions. The number of FMT clinical trials is increasing worldwide, but no trials are registered in the Gulf region; this suggested the need for raising awareness of the latest studies on FMT. This review presented the emergent preclinical and clinical data to give an overview of the potential clinical applications, the benefits, and inconveniences that were worth considering for eventual future testing of fecal transplants in Qatar and the Middle East. This study highlighted the diversity of methods tested and commented on the variables that can affect the assessment of the effectiveness of FMT in specific diseases. The risks associated with FMT and the threat of antimicrobial resistance for this therapeutic approach were reviewed. From gastrointestinal diseases to neurodevelopmental disorders, understanding the roles of the gut microbiota in health and disease should be at the heart of developing novel, standardized, yet personalized, methods for this ancient therapeutic approach.

Indexed as

antibiotic resistanceclinical trialClostridium difficileFecal transplantmicrobiotaQatar

Identifiers

PMID34604008
PMCPMC8475724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.