ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2021
Dimensions of the optic chiasm: quantitative ultrasound comparison between fetuses with anophthalmia/microphthalmia and normal fetuses.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Erratum to dimensions of the optic chiasm: ultrasound quantitative comparison between fetuses with anophthalmia/microphthalmia and normal fetuses.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Article
- Ultrasound Assessment of the Fetal Optic Chiasm.Journal of medical ultrasoundReview
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe precise pathogenesis of anophthalmia/microphthalmia remains unknown. Prenatal observation of the optic chiasm in fetuses with this malformation would assist in understanding the embryonic development of the condition. The present study aimed to establish the normal fetal size ranges of decussation of the optic chiasm, optic nerves, and optic tracts in the axial plane using two-dimensional transabdominal ultrasound throughout gestation and to compare these ranges to the corresponding values in fetuses with anophthalmia/microphthalmia.
methodsIn total, 310 normal fetuses and 16 fetuses with anophthalmia/microphthalmia were included in this study. The widths of the decussation of the optic chiasm, optic nerves, and optic tracts of normal fetuses at 19-40 weeks' gestation were measured in the axial plane by two-dimensional transabdominal ultrasound. The same widths were retrospectively measured in the axial plane using three-dimensional ultrasound in fetuses with anophthalmia/microphthalmia and compared to the results from the normal fetuses.
resultsThe decussation, optic nerves, and optic tracts of 310 normal fetuses were measured. The normal widths of the decussation of the optic chiasm, optic nerves, and optic tracts increased linearly with gestational age. The interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility was excellent for the decussation but relatively low for the optic nerves and optic tracts. The optic nerve width of fetuses with anophthalmia/microphthalmia was significantly smaller than that of normal fetuses (P<0.001), but the widths of the decussation (P=0.061) and optic tracts (P=0.053) were not significantly different between the two groups.
conclusionsThe normal ranges of the decussation of the optic chiasm, optic nerves, and optic tracts established in this study can provide a quantitative basis for prenatal evaluation of the optic pathway. Fetal anophthalmia/microphthalmia may be associated with optic nerve hypoplasia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.