Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34603991›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2021

Photoacoustic microscopy: a novel approach for studying perforator skin flap in a mouse model.

Dong Zhang, Hairen Chen, Xiang Hu, Aixi Yu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Flap Monitoring Techniques: A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dong ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics Trauma and Microsurgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Hairen ChenDepartment of Orthopedics Trauma and Microsurgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Xiang HuDepartment of Orthopedics Trauma and Microsurgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Aixi YuDepartment of Orthopedics Trauma and Microsurgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Wuhan University · CNZhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA comprehensive understanding of cutaneous microvessels is key to the design and use of the perforator skin flap. Compared with the various imaging technologies that have been applied in the clinical practice of the perforator skin flap, photoacoustic microscopy (PAM) is a very promising noninvasive imaging modality with high resolution and deep penetration in biological tissues.

methodsPAM was employed to explore its multiple applications in a perforator skin flap. The following experiments were then conducted in 3 parts. In part 1, 7 mice were used to obtain the preoperative perforator mapping on the mouse back. In parts 2 and 3, 7 mice were used to design and harvest the multiterritory perforator flap. The status of the flap and the morphological changes of choke vessels were subsequently observed by PAM at several time points.

resultsThe results showed that PAM could visualize and assess the vascular physiological and pathological conditions of the skin tissue in real time

conclusionsPAM has great potential to be an effective and precise quantitative imaging tool for perforator skin flap research, such in as flap design, monitoring, and choke vessel observation.

Indexed as

choke vesselperforator skin flapPhotoacoustic microscopy

Identifiers

PMID34603991
PMCPMC8408781
OpenAlexW3177052000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.