ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2021
Improved detection of solitary pulmonary nodules on radiographs compared with deep bone suppression imaging.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe present study aimed to investigate whether deep bone suppression imaging (BSI) could increase the diagnostic performance for solitary pulmonary nodule detection compared with digital tomosynthesis (DTS), dual-energy subtraction (DES) radiography, and conventional chest radiography (CCR).
methodsA total of 256 patients (123 with a solitary pulmonary nodule, 133 with normal findings) were included in the study. The confidence score of 6 observers determined the presence or absence of pulmonary nodules in each patient. These were first analyzed using a CCR image, then with CCR plus deep BSI, then with CCR plus DES radiography, and finally with DTS images. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the performance of the 6 observers in the detection of pulmonary nodules.
resultsFor the 6 observers, the average area under the curve improved significantly from 0.717 with CCR to 0.848 with CCR plus deep BSI (P<0.01), 0.834 with CCR plus DES radiography (P<0.01), and 0.939 with DTS (P<0.01). Comparisons between CCR and CCR plus deep BSI found that the sensitivities of the assessments by the 3 residents increased from 53.2% to 69.5% (P=0.014) for nodules located in the upper lung field, from 30.6% to 44.6% (P=0.015) for nodules that were partially/completely obscured by the bone, and from 33.2% to 45.8% (P=0.006) for nodules <10 mm.
conclusionsThe deep BSI technique can significantly increase the sensitivity of radiology residents for solitary pulmonary nodules compared with CCR. Increased detection was seen mainly for smaller nodules, nodules with partial/complete obscuration, and nodules located in the upper lung field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.