ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2021
Comparison between tumour metabolism derived from
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Pooled it
- Bone marrow SUVmax onImmunologic research · 2026Article
- IdentifyingQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Article
- Case report: Thoracic and lumbar plasma cell myeloma mimicking hemangiomas on MRI andFrontiers in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background
methodsFrom March 2012 to March 2019, 57 patients with newly diagnosed MM addressed to our institution for baseline
resultsThe distribution of total metabolic tumour volume (TMTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) values among the three LP score categories was almost stochastic, with no significant association (P=0.70). Additionally, no significant association between TMTV/TLG and any of the six cytogenetic abnormalities included in LP score calculation. A significant association was found between visual high suspicion of DBI and LP score (P=0.036), and between this visual parameter and the presence of 1q gain (P=0.049).
conclusionsThere is no significant association between quantitative metabolic parameters assessed with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.