Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34603935›Full record

ReviewReview journal of autism and developmental disorders2023

A Systematic Review of Self-Reported Stress Questionnaires in People on the Autism Spectrum.

Anoushka Thoen, Jean Steyaert, Kaat Alaerts, Kris Evers, Tine Van Damme

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Review journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Methodological quality of 100 recent systematic reviews of health-related outcome measurement instruments: an overview of reviews.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anoushka ThoenHerestraat 49 - box 1510, 3000 Leuven, Belgium Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Research Group for Adapted Physical Activity and Psychomotor Rehabilitation, KU Leuven.ORCID 0000-0001-6408-220X
Jean SteyaertLeuven, Belgium Leuven Autism Research (LAuRes), KU Leuven.
Kaat AlaertsLeuven, Belgium Leuven Autism Research (LAuRes), KU Leuven.
Kris EversLeuven, Belgium Leuven Autism Research (LAuRes), KU Leuven.
Tine Van DammeHerestraat 49 - box 1510, 3000 Leuven, Belgium Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Research Group for Adapted Physical Activity and Psychomotor Rehabilitation, KU Leuven.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The goal of this systematic review was to provide an overview of self-report measures of stress in populations on the autism spectrum. In addition, information regarding psychometric properties was discussed as well. Methods: Four databases were systematically searched following the PRISMA guidelines and using strict eligibility criteria. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the COSMIN checklist. Results: Eight questionnaires were previously used in populations on the autism spectrum, reported over 31 studies. Discussion: Future research should focus more on examining psychometric properties of these self-report measures in this population as current evidence is scarce. In addition, it is important to consider which concept of stress one aims to measure as not all questionnaires cover the same aspects of stress. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40489-021-00293-4.

Indexed as

Autism spectrum disorderSelf-reportStressSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34603935
PMCPMC8475841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.