Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34603842›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2021

Do Medical Students' Learning Styles and Approaches Explain Their Views and Behavior Regarding Lecture Attendance?

Ali El Mokahal, Ali Ahmad, Joseph R Habib, Ali A Nasrallah, George Francis, Ramzi Sabra, Nathalie K Zgheib

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ali El MokahalFaculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Ali AhmadFaculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Joseph R HabibFaculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Ali A NasrallahFaculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
George FrancisFaculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Ramzi SabraProgram for Research and Innovation in Medical Education, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine , American University of Beirut, PO. Box 11-0236, Riad El Solh, Beirut, Lebanon.
Nathalie K ZgheibProgram for Research and Innovation in Medical Education, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine , American University of Beirut, PO. Box 11-0236, Riad El Solh, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID 0000-0002-0571-768X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMedical students' attendance at lectures, particularly in the preclinical years, has been steadily declining over the years. One of the many explanations offered for this observation is that students have different learning styles and approaches, such that not all of them benefit from attending lectures; however, no studies have specifically examined this possibility. While there is evidence against learning styles as affecting objective measures of learning, they are associated with subjective measures of learning and may therefore influence student behavior. We hypothesized that students' learning styles and/or approaches influence their views about the value and purpose of lectures and their motivation to attend them, which, in turn will affect their behavior. MATERIALS AND

methodsA LimeSurvey was distributed to all preclinical students at the American University of Beirut. The survey included questions about demographic data, self-reported attendance rates in Year 1 of medical school, two validated and standardized questionnaires assessing the students' learning styles (visual, auditory, kinesthetic, tactile, group, individual) and learning approaches (superficial, deep, strategic), and a series of questions exploring the students' views about the purpose and value of lectures and their motivation to attend lectures.

resultsNo associations were found between learning styles or approaches and attendance rates, but this may have been confounded by the mandatory attendance policy at the time. There were, however, a few positive associations between some learning styles or approaches and the students' views about the value of attending lectures. In particular, students with high scores as auditory learners tended to see absolutely no value in attending lectures, and those with high scores as group, auditory or visual learners, tended to see less value in taking their own notes in lectures. Students with superficial approaches to learning felt that watching videos of a lecture provides equivalent education to attending a lecture. There were no statistically significant associations with either the perceived purpose of lectures or the motivation to attend lectures after correction for multiple testing.

conclusionsThis study reveals that except for some interesting findings related to auditory learners, differences in learning styles or approaches among students cannot adequately explain differences in their attitudes, and likely, behavior, regarding lecture attendance. The idea that learning styles and approaches can influence educational preferences and outcomes, while attractive and intuitive, continues to require supporting evidence. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-021-01362-3.

Indexed as

AttendanceClassroomLearning approachesLearning stylesMedical students

Identifiers

PMID34603842
PMCPMC8446112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.