ArticleMedical science educator2021
Improving Medical Student Clinical Knowledge and Skills Through Influenza Education.
Article in Medical science educator, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Vaccine hesitancy educational interventions for medical students: A systematic narrative review in western countries.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024Pooled it
- Preventative care in student-run free clinics: a narrative review on feasibility, ethics, and recommendations.BMC medical education · 2024Review
- Learning Outcomes from Participation in Student-Run Health Clinics: A Systematic Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis project aimed to implement a rigorous evaluation of influenza vaccine education as a learning tool for influenza and medical knowledge and clinical proficiency.
methodsAmong 280 Stony Brook University first-year medical students, 80 were randomly selected to participate in the Stony Brook influenza vaccine education program. Participants completed an anonymous pre-survey assessing participants': (1) experience and attitudes towards flu vaccines, (2) knowledge base of the flu virus and vaccine, (3) self-rated knowledge of the flu virus and vaccine, and (4) self-rated proficiency of clinical skills relevant to administering flu vaccines. Students then completed an educational module and vaccinated either employee healthcare workers or patients at a student-run free health clinic. Following the vaccination experience, participants completed a post-survey including questions identical to those on the pre-survey and questions regarding their evaluation of the flu vaccine education program. The pre- and post-survey data were paired, established through matching surrogate study identification codes, and differences between survey responses were analyzed using paired t-tests.
resultsEighty first-year medical students participated in the pre-survey, while 55 participated in the post-survey. Compared to the pre-survey, participants significantly improved their knowledge base related to the flu virus and vaccine as well as their self-rated knowledge and clinical skills, in the post-survey.
conclusionsThe Stony Brook influenza vaccination program succeeded in establishing medical student training and practice with service learning. Our study is the first to provide quantitative evidence of influenza vaccine education programs improving medical student knowledge and clinical skills. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-021-01355-2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.