Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34603782›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced research2021

Separation of ctDNA by superparamagnetic bead particles in microfluidic platform for early cancer detection.

Samla Gauri Balakrishnan, Mohd Ridzuan Ahmad, Seyed Saeid Rahimian Koloor, Michal Petrů

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Liquid biopsies in cancer.Molecular biomedicine · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Samla Gauri BalakrishnanDivision of Control and Mechatronics Engineering, School of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor, Malaysia.
Mohd Ridzuan AhmadDivision of Control and Mechatronics Engineering, School of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor, Malaysia.
Seyed Saeid Rahimian KoloorInstitute for Nanomaterials, Advanced Technologies and Innovation, Technical University of Liberec, Studentska 2, 461 17 Liberec, Czech Republic.
Michal PetrůInstitute for Nanomaterials, Advanced Technologies and Innovation, Technical University of Liberec, Studentska 2, 461 17 Liberec, Czech Republic.
Technical University of Liberec · CZUniversity of Technology Malaysia · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Conventional biopsy, based on extraction from a tumor of a solid tissue specimen requiring needles, endoscopic devices, excision or surgery, is at risk of infection, internal bleeding or prolonged recovery. A non-invasive liquid biopsy is one of the greatest axiomatic consequences of the identification of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a replaceable surgical tumor bioQpsy technique. Most of the literature studies thus far presented ctDNA detection at almost final stage III or IV of cancer, where the treatment option or cancer management is nearly impossible for diagnosis. Objective: Hence, this paper aims to present a simulation study of extraction and separation of ctDNA from the blood plasma of cancer patients of stage I and II by superparamagnetic (SPM) bead particles in a microfluidic platform for early and effective cancer detection. Method: The extraction of ctDNA is based on microfiltration of particle size to filter some impurities and thrombocytes plasma, while the separation of ctDNA is based on magnetic manipulation to high yield that can be used for the upstream process. Result: Based on the simulation results, an average of 5.7 ng of ctDNA was separated efficiently for every 10 µL blood plasma input and this can be used for early analysis of cancer management. The particle tracing module from COMSOL Multiphysics traced ctDNA with 65.57% of sensitivity and 95.38% of specificity. Conclusion: The findings demonstrate the ease of use and versatility of a microfluidics platform and SPM bead particles in clinical research related to the preparation of biological samples. As a sample preparation stage for early analysis and cancer diagnosis, the extraction and separation of ctDNA is most important, so precision medicine can be administered.

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNANeoplasmsHumansLiquid BiopsyMagnetic Iron Oxide NanoparticlesMicrofluidicsCirculating Tumor DNACancer biomarkerCirculating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detectionCOMSOL Multiphysics Simulation studyLiquid biopsy Magnetic manipulation

Identifiers

PMID34603782
PMCPMC8463959
OpenAlexW3133668549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.