Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34603742›Full record

ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2021

Quantifying head acceleration exposure via instrumented mouthguards (iMG): a validity and feasibility study protocol to inform iMG suitability for the TaCKLE project.

Gregory Tierney, Daniel Weaving, James Tooby, Marwan Al-Dawoud, Sharief Hendricks, Gemma Phillips, Keith A Stokes, Kevin Till, Ben Jones

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. On-Field Deployment and Validation for Wearable Devices.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Gregory TierneySport and Exercise Science Research Institute, Ulster University, Belfast, UK.
Daniel WeavingCarnegie Applied Rugby Research (CARR) Centre, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
James ToobyCarnegie Applied Rugby Research (CARR) Centre, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Marwan Al-DawoudCarnegie Applied Rugby Research (CARR) Centre, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Sharief HendricksCarnegie Applied Rugby Research (CARR) Centre, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3416-6266
Gemma PhillipsCarnegie Applied Rugby Research (CARR) Centre, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Keith A StokesDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Kevin TillCarnegie Applied Rugby Research (CARR) Centre, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Ben JonesCarnegie Applied Rugby Research (CARR) Centre, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4274-6236
Australian Football League · AUThe Football Association · GBUniversity of Cape Town · ZALeeds Beckett University · GBUniversity of Ulster · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Instrumented mouthguards (iMGs) have the potential to quantify head acceleration exposures in sport. The Rugby Football League is looking to deploy iMGs to quantify head acceleration exposures as part of the Tackle and Contact Kinematics, Loads and Exposure (TaCKLE) project. iMGs and associated software platforms are novel, thus limited validation studies exist. The aim of this paper is to describe the methods that will determine the validity (ie, laboratory validation of kinematic measures and on-field validity) and feasibility (ie, player comfort and wearability and practitioner considerations) of available iMGs for quantifying head acceleration events in rugby league. Phase 1 will determine the reliability and validity of iMG kinematic measures (peak linear acceleration, peak rotational velocity, peak rotational acceleration), based on laboratory criterion standards. Players will have three-dimensional dental scans and be provided with available iMGs for phase 2 and phase 3. Phase 2 will determine the on-field validity of iMGs (ie, identifying true positive head acceleration events during a match). Phase 3 will evaluate player perceptions of fit (too loose, too tight, bulky, small/thin, held mouth open, held teeth apart, pain in jaw muscles, uneven bite), comfort (on lips, gum, tongue, teeth) and function (speech, swallowing, dry mouth). Phase 4 will evaluate the practical feasibility of iMGs, as determined by practitioners using the system usability scale (preparing iMG system and managing iMG data). The outcome will provide a systematic and robust assessment of a range of iMGs, which will help inform the suitability of each iMG system for the TaCKLE project.

Indexed as

American footballconcussionheadinjuryrugby

Identifiers

PMID34603742
PMCPMC8438841
OpenAlexW3200949711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.