Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34603711›Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2021

Unnecessary magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: How much is it really costing the NHS?

Muhammad Murtaza Khan, Bethan Pincher, Ricardo Pacheco

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Is Magnetic Resonance Imaging Overused Among Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty?Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Muhammad Murtaza KhanNorthern Lincolnshire and Goole Foundation Trust, Scunthorpe General Hospital, DN15 7BH, UK.
Bethan PincherNorthern Lincolnshire and Goole Foundation Trust, Scunthorpe General Hospital, DN15 7BH, UK.
Ricardo PachecoNorthern Lincolnshire and Goole Foundation Trust, Scunthorpe General Hospital, DN15 7BH, UK.
Scunthorpe General Hospital · GBNorthern Lincolnshire and Goole Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS AND

objectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the indications for patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee prior to referral to an orthopaedic specialist and to ascertain whether these scans altered initial management. MATERIALS AND

methodA retrospective review of all referrals received by a single specialist knee surgeon over a 1-year period was performed. Patient demographics, relevant history, examination findings and past surgical procedures were documented. Patients having undergone Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) prior to referral were identified and indications for the scans recorded. These were reviewed against The National health services (NHS) guidelines for Primary Care Physicians to identify if the imaging performed was appropriate in each case.

resultsA total of two sixty-one (261) patients were referred between 1

conclusionSeventy six percent of patients referred to orthopaedics had inappropriate Magnetic resonance imaging arranged by their primary care physician. For a single consultant's referrals over 1 year these unnecessary MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) of knee cost National Health Services (NHS) £13,200. Closer adherence to the guidelines by primary care physicians will result in a financial saving, better patient experience and a more effective use of resources.

Indexed as

Magnetic resonance imagingNational health servicesPlain radiograph

Identifiers

PMID34603711
PMCPMC8463827
OpenAlexW3197217415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.