Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34603691›Full record

ArticleClinical kidney journal2021

Tweet me: conferencing in the era of COVID-19 and 280 characters.

Kate I Stevens, Edoardo Melilli, Hugo Diniz, Keith Gillis, Dominique Guerrot, Nuria Montero, Maria Jose Soler, Tejas Desai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kate I StevensGlasgow Renal &Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2291-1692
Edoardo MelilliHospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Hugo DinizNephrology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal.
Keith GillisGlasgow Renal &Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Dominique GuerrotInserm U1096, Normandie Université, 76000 Rouen, France.
Nuria MonteroHospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Maria Jose SolerNephrology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research, Barcelona, Spain.
Tejas DesaiUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs, Charlotte, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The European Renal Association - European Dialysis and Transplant Association (ERA-EDTA) Social Media (SoMe) Team provides Twitter coverage of the annual congress. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, #ERAEDTA20 was the first major Nephrology congress to be delivered virtually. The effect of The SoMe Team and the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic have not been explored previously. Tweets of the ERA-EDTA congresses 2016-20, using official hashtags, were evaluated. Metadata of each tweet were collected prospectively; original tweets, retweets and evidence-based tweets were identified. The gender of tweet author and location of Twitter activity were established. Network maps were created to ascertain the degree of polarization between the 2019 and 2020 Twitter activity, using Gephi 0.9.2. Between 2016 and 2019, the total number of tweets and the number of tweet authors increased, as did the proportion of female authors (20% versus 27%). In 2019, there were fewer multimedia and evidence-based tweets: 8% versus 20% in 2016. Globally, there were fewer Nephrology conferences in 2020 and the number of tweets per day reduced by 53% from 2019. In 2020, The ERA-EDTA congress saw an increase in authors of 9% and only an 8% reduction in tweets. It was easier to disseminate information in 2020, measured by increased correlation coefficient (0.14 versus 0.12 in 2019). A higher proportion of countries was represented (

Indexed as

congressesCOVID-19onlinesocial mediaTwittervirtual

Identifiers

PMID34603691
PMCPMC8083586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.