Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34603641›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2021

Knowledge of and Compliance with Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines among Anesthesiologists: A Nationwide Survey in China.

Hui Li, Xiangyang Yu, Rui Zhou, Ya Wang, Xuedi Zhang, Shengwen Song, Qinghua Chen, Baoli Cheng, Xiangming Fang

RetractedOpen access · hybridAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hui LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1525-6098
Xiangyang YuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7207-8876
Rui ZhouDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4287-9856
Ya WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5385-4593
Xuedi ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6543-8925
Shengwen SongDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3363-7468
Qinghua ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0498-8234
Baoli ChengDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0909-3050
Xiangming FangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2283-1863
Zhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to describe anesthesiologists' knowledge of and compliance with the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines in the perioperative management of patients with sepsis in China. We designed a questionnaire-based, cross-sectional survey. We sent out online questionnaires during 2019 to evaluate whether anesthesiologists in China were familiar with and applied SSC guidelines in perioperative management. We also compared anesthesiologists' knowledge of and compliance with the guidelines among different levels of hospital. In this study, we obtained 971 responses from anesthesiology departments across China. The survey responses showed that 39.0% of anesthesiologists rated their knowledge of the SSC guidelines as being "very familiar" or at least "somewhat familiar." In total, 68.9% of respondents chose "Initial fluid resuscitation followed by frequent hemodynamic reassessment" as their therapy strategy for patients with septic shock; 62.0% of anesthesiologists chose lactate as a marker of initial resuscitation in clinical practice, and 39.1% thought bundle therapy needed to be started within 1 hour of sepsis diagnosis. A total of 37.1% and 27.1% of respondents chose hydroxyethyl starches and gelatins, respectively, as the preferred fluids for septic shock. As the first choice of vasopressors in patients with sepsis, 727 (74.9%) anesthesiologists chose the correct answer (norepinephrine). Anesthesiologists from tertiary hospitals (class A) had greater familiarity and compliance with the SSC guidelines than those from other hospitals (

Indexed as

SepsisShock, SepticAnesthesiologistsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID34603641
PMCPMC8481065
OpenAlexW3201637965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.