Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34603633›Full record

ReviewBehavior analysis in practice2022

Culturally Relevant Pedagogy and Applied Behavior Analysis: Addressing Educational Disparities in PK-12 Schools.

Amoy K Hugh-Pennie, Mya Hernandez, Margaret Uwayo, Gaige Johnson, Denise Ross

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behavior analysis in practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amoy K Hugh-PennieIndependent Researcher, New York, NY USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1537-3649
Mya HernandezLake Michigan College, Benton Harbor, MI USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4884-8858
Margaret UwayoIndependent Researcher, Kalamazoo, MI USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3180-5664
Gaige JohnsonIndependent Researcher, Boston, MA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8599-4048
Denise RossInstitute for Urban Education, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1211-5599

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to describe the theory of culturally relevant pedagogy (CRP) and its application to PK-12 education for behavior analysts working in schools. CRP is an educational framework that asserts that successful teachers of African American students help their students gain three repertoires: (1) sociopolitical awareness, (2) cultural competence, and (3) academic excellence. The CRP framework was designed to counter the effects that racial bias has on the academic and disciplinary experiences of some students of color. This article suggests that applied behavior analysis and CRP, when used together, may strengthen educators' efforts to reduce the effects of racism that some students of color experience. The authors first explain the tenets of CRP based on the work of Ladson-Billings (1995a, 1995b). Next, points of convergence between ABA and CRP are described. Finally, the authors offer recommendations for behavior analysts to consider when applying CRP in schools through the provision of examples of strategies and tactics derived from the behavioral literature that align with the CRP framework. The framework presented in this article has implications for behavior analysts interested in applying culturally relevant practices to their work as educators.

Indexed as

Cultural competenceCulturally relevant pedagogyCulturally relevant teachingDiscriminationRacismTechnology of teaching

Identifiers

PMID34603633
PMCPMC8477619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.