ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2021
Quality of life in irradiated patients with head and neck cancer: A preliminary study about the impact of prosthetic rehabilitation.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oral Health in Patients with History of Head and Neck Cancer: Complexity and Benefits of a Targeted Oral Healthcare Pathway.Current oncology reports · 2024Review
- Quality of life of patients irradiated for head and neck cancer and impact of rehabilitation with a removable dental prosthetic: 1-year follow-up study.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOral quality of life is of great importance in head and neck cancer, where each patient combines functional, social and esthetic needs. Our study aimed to evaluate the influence of prosthetic and/or maxillofacial rehabilitation on patients' perceived oral quality of life. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe General Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) was used in 28 patients with head and neck cancer who had undergone radiotherapy, recruited at La Timone University Hospital, Marseille, France, and who required prosthetic rehabilitation. The questionnaire was completed at three timepoints in the study: before insertion of the prosthesis (T0), then one week (T1) and three months after insertion (T2).
resultsThe percentage of patients with poor quality of oral health decreased from 96.4% to 64.3% between T0 and T1. Between T0 and T1, the mean score of the psychosocial component of the GOHAI increased from 14.28 ± 4.51 to 20.14 ± 5.20 and the mean functional component score increased from 9.32 ± 3.86 to 12.07 ± 4.04.
conclusionsProsthetic rehabilitation appeared to have a positive impact on oral quality of life in our study subjects, particularly on social relations and self-esteem. Its influence on pain and discomfort remains to be clarified. This preliminary study gives a prospective view of the impact of prosthetic rehabilitation in patients with head and neck cancer who had undergone radiotherapy. Analysis of data yielded by cross-referencing of different questionnaires should make it possible to refine these results.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.