ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2021
Construction of a new cervical anatomically adaptive titanium mesh cage based on measurements of cervical geometry: A morphological and cadaveric study.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The number of fusion levels as a potential factor influencing long-term complications of anterior controllable antedisplacement fusion: a biomechanical analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- 3D-printed titanium vertebra in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A comparative analysis of perioperative, radiographic, and clinical outcomes.Journal of orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mismatch between the titanium mesh cage and cervical geometries is an important factor that induces subsidence in anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF). The aim of the present study was to construct a new quadrate anatomically adaptive titanium mesh cage (AA-TMC) that matches well with the cervical geometries and segmental alignment in one- and two-level ACCF. Computed tomography (CT) scans of 54 individuals were used to measure the cervical endplate geometries. X-rays of 74 young individuals were used to measure the intervertebral body angle (IBA) and intervertebral body height (IBH) of the surgical segments. The AA-TMC was designed based on these measured parameters. A total of 18 cervical cadaveric specimens underwent successive one- and two-level ACCF using the AA-TMC. Postoperatively, the specimens underwent CT scanning to assess the degree of matching of the TMC-endplate interface (TEI), IBA and IBH. A TEI interval <0.5 mm was considered well matching. In the sagittal plane, 93.8% of the inferior endplates were arched, whereas 94.8% of the superior endplates were flat. In the coronal plane, 82.9% of the inferior endplates and 93.8% of the superior endplates were flat. A total of 91.7 and 94.4% of the TEIs were well matched in one- and two-level ACCF, respectively. The postoperative IBA and IBH values were consistent with the values of young individuals. The AA-TMC achieved good matching with cervical geometries and segmental alignment in one- and two-level ACCF, and is proposed for use in ACCF to increase the contact at the TEI and achieve sufficient lordosis restoration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.