Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34603209›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2021

Effectiveness of Medical Treatment of Cushing's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Julia Simões Corrêa Galendi, Afonso Nogueira Simões Correa Neto, Michelle Demetres, Cesar Luiz Boguszewski, Vania Dos Santos Nunes Nogueira

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Cushing's disease across the lifespan: a case-based clinical review.Archives of endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Levoketoconazole.Hospital pharmacy · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Julia Simões Corrêa GalendiUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Cologne, Germany.
Afonso Nogueira Simões Correa NetoMedical School, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Michelle DemetresSamuel J. Wood Library & C.V. Starr Biomedical Information Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Cesar Luiz BoguszewskiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Endocrine Division (SEMPR), Federal University of Parana, Curitiba, Brazil.
Vania Dos Santos Nunes NogueiraDepartment of Internal Medicine, São Paulo State University/UNESP, Medical School, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade Federal do Paraná · BRUniversity Hospital Cologne · DEWeill Cornell Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of pasireotide, cabergoline, ketoconazole, levoketoconazole, metyrapone, osilodrostat, and temozolomide for the treatment of Cushing's disease (CD). Methods: The primary outcomes were the proportion of CD control, adverse events (AE), and reduction of urinary free cortisol. Search strategies were applied to Embase, Medline, and CENTRAL. Independent reviewers assessed the study eligibility, extracted data, and evaluated risk of bias. Standardized mean difference was calculated with 95% confidence interval (CI) for continuous data ( Results: Twenty-nine controlled and non-controlled studies were included. No study with temozolomide and levoketoconazole and one study with osilodrostat fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The meta-analyses of proportion of CD control was 35% for cabergoline (95% CI: 27-43%, six studies, 141 participants), 44% for pasireotide (95% CI: 25-35%, eight studies, 522 participants), 41% for ketoconazole (95% CI: 36-46%, six studies, 450 participants), 66% for metyrapone (95% CI: 46-87%, four studies, 66 participants), and of 66.4% for osilodrostat (95% CI: 57.9, 74.3, 97 participants, one study). One study compared two different treatments (cabergoline Conclusion: The superiority of one drug over another could not be determined due to lack of controlled studies, but the proportion of disease control identified in our meta-analysis may support clinical decision. New therapeutic options should be investigated due to the limited efficacy and tolerability of the currently available medical treatment for patients with Cushing's disease. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020205567, identifier CRD42020205567.

Indexed as

Drugs, InvestigationalHumansImidazolesPituitary ACTH HypersecretionPyridinesSomatostatinTherapies, InvestigationalTreatment OutcomeDrugs, InvestigationalImidazolesOsilodrostatpasireotidePyridinesSomatostatincabergolineCushing’s diseaseketoconazolemeta-analysismetyraponepasireotide (SOM230)systematic literature review

Identifiers

PMID34603209
PMCPMC8485729
OpenAlexW3199504842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.