Diagnostic Evaluation of Visual Snow.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

1. External Dynamic Visual Noise Matched to the Appearance of Visual Snow Fails to Reproduce Key Perceptual Properties of the Phenomenon.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026
   Article
2. Understanding visual perception in visual snow syndrome: a battery of psychophysical tests plus the 30-day clinical diary.Brain communications · 2024
   Article
3. Adapting to Visual Noise Alleviates Visual Snow.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023
   Article
4. Visual snow syndrome and migraine: a review.Eye (London, England) · 2023
   Review
5. Differential Diagnosis of Visual Phenomena Associated with Migraine: Spotlight on Aura and Visual Snow Syndrome.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as