ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021
Validation of the Chinese Version of the Procrastination at Work Scale.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Exploring the relationships among interpersonal competence, perceived stress and cognitive reappraisal in Chinese PAP recruits: a longitudinal cross-lag study.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Pooled it
- The relationship between interpersonal competence and depressive symptoms among Chinese people's armed police soldiers: an integration of cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Development of the psychopathological vulnerability index for screening at-risk youths: a Rasch model approach.Npj mental health research · 2024Article
- Clinical nurses' work procrastination and smartphone addiction: a potential profile study.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Assessing measurement invariance of the SEGUE framework among Chinese and Ghanaian patients: A cross-sectional study.PEC innovation · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to validate the Chinese version of the Procrastination at Work Scale (PAWS), a recently developed scale aimed at assessing procrastination in the work context. We translated the PAWS into Chinese and conducted exploratory factor analysis on participants in sample A (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.