Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34602933›Full record

ArticleTobacco induced diseases2021

Geographical distribution and social determinants of Tobacco 21 policy adoption and retail inspections in the United States, 2015-2019.

Hongying Dai, Niran Tamrakar, Nirosha Rathnayake, Kaeli Samson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco induced diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Interaction Between State-Level Cigarette Prices and County-Level Tobacco 21 Coverage on Cigarette Smoking Outcomes Among US Adolescents.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hongying DaiCollege of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, United States.
Niran TamrakarCollege of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, United States.
Nirosha RathnayakeCollege of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, United States.
Kaeli SamsonCollege of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, United States.
University of Nebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTobacco control laws that raise the minimum age of tobacco sales to 21 years (T21) play a pivotal role in youth tobacco prevention, yet empirical data are sorely needed to inform enforcement, compliance efforts, and future legislation.

methodsSpatial analysis was conducted at the zip code level by geocoding the states and localities that adopted T21 ordinances from 2015 to 2019. A multi-level logistic regression model was conducted to examine disparities in neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES), FDA retail inspection, and state-level tobacco control policies associated with T21 adoption.

resultsT21 adoption at the state and local level increased considerably from 1.4% of zip codes in 2015 to 40.2% in 2019. However, the T21 ordinances were disproportionally adopted in New England (82.6%) and Pacific (73.6%) regions with scarce coverage in East South Central (<0.1%), Mountain (1.6%), and West North Central regions (6.1%). The T21 policies were more likely to be adopted in areas with stronger tobacco control policies, urban areas (vs rural, adjusted odds ratio, AOR=1.25, p=0.005), areas with a larger Hispanic (AOR=1.19, p<0.0001) or Asian population (AOR=1.12, p<0.0001), and in areas where the population had higher levels of education (AOR=1.05, p<0.0001). It was less likely to be adopted in areas with larger proportions of American Indians, youths, and young adults. Nearly 40% of zip codes with tobacco retailers did not receive annual FDA tobacco retail inspections for underage sales in 2019. The average retail violation rate of underage sales of tobacco products in T21 regions was lower than in non-T21 regions.

conclusionsDisparities in T21 adoption, retail inspections, and retail compliance may limit the policy impact. Unified enforcement of youth tobacco access restrictions with resources and interventions in vulnerable communities is needed to reduce tobacco-related health disparities.

Indexed as

disparitiessocial determinantTobacco 21

Identifiers

PMID34602933
PMCPMC8445336
OpenAlexW3200357963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.