ArticleTobacco induced diseases2021
Geographical distribution and social determinants of Tobacco 21 policy adoption and retail inspections in the United States, 2015-2019.
Article in Tobacco induced diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Associations between county-level e-cigarette-inclusive Tobacco 21 law population coverage and e-cigarette use behaviors among United States adolescents in Monitoring the Future.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2026Article
- Mapping the mortality niche of chronic lower respiratory diseases complicated by respiratory failure: a multiscale spatial analysis of environmental and social drivers.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Unequal Impact of Flavored Tobacco Across Populations: From Neuroscience to Policy.Basic and clinical neuroscience · 2025Review
- SimSmoke simulation models distinguished by race/ethnicity: past and future trends and the potential role of policy.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2025Article
- Public Perception of the Tobacco 21 Amendment on Twitter in the United States: Observational Study.JMIR infodemiology · 2024Observational
- Interaction Between State-Level Cigarette Prices and County-Level Tobacco 21 Coverage on Cigarette Smoking Outcomes Among US Adolescents.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2024Article
- Community Engagement, Jurisdictional Experience, and Previous Tobacco-Related Ordinances in Neighboring Communities as Drivers of Flavored Tobacco Bans in Los Angeles County.Preventing chronic disease · 2024Article
- Patterns, clusters, and transitions in U.S. state ENDS policy implementation: 2010-2020.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Rates of Age Verification for Cigarette and E-cigarette Purchases as a Function of State T21 Laws Before and After Implementation of the Federal T21 Law in the United States.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023Article
- Strengthening Tobacco 21 implementation and enforcement to reduce tobacco-related health disparities: A stakeholder engagement project.Tobacco prevention & cessation · 2023Article
- Illuminating a Path Forward for Tobacco Nation: Projected Impacts of Recommended Policies on Geographic Disparities.Tobacco use insights · 2023Article
- State T21, Restrictions on Flavored E-Cigarette Products, and Non-Medical Cannabis Sales Legalization in Relation to Young Adult Reports of Vape Shop Age Verification and Product Offerings: A Multilevel Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Restrictions on Tobacco Sales to Youth Younger Than 21 Years in Cleveland, Ohio, Area.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- A Rapid Evaluation of the US Federal Tobacco 21 (T21) Law and Lessons From Statewide T21 Policies: Findings From Population-Level Surveys.Preventing chronic disease · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTobacco control laws that raise the minimum age of tobacco sales to 21 years (T21) play a pivotal role in youth tobacco prevention, yet empirical data are sorely needed to inform enforcement, compliance efforts, and future legislation.
methodsSpatial analysis was conducted at the zip code level by geocoding the states and localities that adopted T21 ordinances from 2015 to 2019. A multi-level logistic regression model was conducted to examine disparities in neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES), FDA retail inspection, and state-level tobacco control policies associated with T21 adoption.
resultsT21 adoption at the state and local level increased considerably from 1.4% of zip codes in 2015 to 40.2% in 2019. However, the T21 ordinances were disproportionally adopted in New England (82.6%) and Pacific (73.6%) regions with scarce coverage in East South Central (<0.1%), Mountain (1.6%), and West North Central regions (6.1%). The T21 policies were more likely to be adopted in areas with stronger tobacco control policies, urban areas (vs rural, adjusted odds ratio, AOR=1.25, p=0.005), areas with a larger Hispanic (AOR=1.19, p<0.0001) or Asian population (AOR=1.12, p<0.0001), and in areas where the population had higher levels of education (AOR=1.05, p<0.0001). It was less likely to be adopted in areas with larger proportions of American Indians, youths, and young adults. Nearly 40% of zip codes with tobacco retailers did not receive annual FDA tobacco retail inspections for underage sales in 2019. The average retail violation rate of underage sales of tobacco products in T21 regions was lower than in non-T21 regions.
conclusionsDisparities in T21 adoption, retail inspections, and retail compliance may limit the policy impact. Unified enforcement of youth tobacco access restrictions with resources and interventions in vulnerable communities is needed to reduce tobacco-related health disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.