ArticlePublic opinion quarterly2021
Sharing Data Collected with Smartphone Sensors: Willingness, Participation, and Nonparticipation Bias.
Article in Public opinion quarterly, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unlocking insights: assessing the quality of conventional and image-based responses on books at home in an online mobile survey.Quality & quantity · 2026Article
- The TimeUse+ data set: 4 weeks of time use and expenditure data based on GPS tracks.Transportation · 2026Article
- Assessing mobile instant messenger networks with donated data.Social network analysis and mining · 2026Article
- Data Donation as a Method to Measure Physical Activity in Older Adults: Cross-Sectional Web Survey Assessing Consent Rates, Donation Success, and Bias.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Acceptability of Active and Passive Data Collection Methods for Mobile Health Research: Cross-Sectional Survey of an Online Adult Sample in the United States.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Incentives and Trust Are the Main Drivers of Recruiting Participants in 6 African Countries via Web-Based Environments: A Vignette Survey Experiment.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Validating a willingness to share measure of a vignette experiment using real-world behavioral data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Promoting safer gambling through social norms and goal setting: A qualitative process analysis of participants' experiences in the EROGamb 2.0 feasibility trial.Internet interventions · 2024Article
- Willingness of Participation in an Application-Based Digital Data Collection among Different Social Groups and Smartphone User Clusters.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Inference with non-probability samples and survey data integration: a science mapping study.Metron · 2023Article
- Increasing the Acceptance of Smartphone-Based Data Collection.Public opinion quarterly · 2023Article
- Ethical Considerations for Augmenting Surveys with Auxiliary Data Sources.Public opinion quarterly · 2023Review
- A new experiment on the use of images to answer web survey questions.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, (Statistics in Society) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Smartphone sensors allow measurement of phenomena that are difficult or impossible to capture via self-report (e.g., geographical movement, physical activity). Sensors can reduce respondent burden by eliminating survey questions and improve measurement accuracy by replacing/augmenting self-reports. However, if respondents who are not willing to collect sensor data differ on critical attributes from those who are, the results can be biased. Research on the mechanisms of willingness to collect sensor data mostly comes from (nonprobability) online panels and is hypothetical (i.e., asks participants about the likelihood of participation in a sensor-based study). In a cross-sectional general population randomized experiment, we investigate how features of the request and respondent characteristics influence willingness to share (WTS) and actually sharing smartphone-sensor data. We manipulate the request to either mention or not mention (1) how participation will benefit the participant, (2) participants' autonomy over data collection, and (3) that data will be kept confidential. We assess nonparticipation bias using the administrative records. WTS and actually sharing varies by sensor task, participants' autonomy over data sharing, their smartphone skills, level of privacy concerns, and attitudes toward surveys. Fewer people agree to share photos and a video than geolocation, but all who agreed to share photos or a video actually did. Some nonresponse and nonparticipation biases are substantial and make each other worse, but others jointly reduce the overall bias. Our findings suggest that sensor-data-sharing decisions depend on sample members' situation when asked to share and the nature of the sensor task rather than the sensor type.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.