Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34602848›Full record

ArticleEducation and information technologies2022

Revealing latent traits in the social behavior of distance learning students.

Rozita Tsoni, Christos Τ Panagiotakopoulos, Vassilios S Verykios

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Education and information technologies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rozita TsoniSchool of Science and Technology, Hellenic Open University, Patras, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-1088-7648
Christos Τ PanagiotakopoulosDepartment of Primary Education, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Vassilios S VerykiosSchool of Science and Technology, Hellenic Open University, Patras, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper proposes a multilayered methodology for analyzing distance learning students' data to gain insight into the learning progress of the student subjects both in an individual basis and as members of a learning community during the course taking process. The communication aspect is of high importance in educational research. Additionally, it is difficult to assess as it involves multiple relationships and different levels of interaction. Social network analysis (SNA) allows the visualization of this complexity and provides quantified measures for evaluation. Thus, initially, SNA techniques were applied to create one-mode, undirected networks and capture important metrics originating from students' interactions in the fora of the courses offered in the context of distance learning programs. Principal component analysis and clustering were used next to reveal latent students' traits and common patterns in their social interactions with other students and their learning behavior. We selected two different courses to test this methodology and to highlight convergent and divergent features between them. Three major factors that explain over 70% of the variance were identified and four groups of students were found, characterized by common elements in students' learning profile. The results highlight the importance of academic performance, social behavior and online participation as the main criteria for clustering that could be helpful for tutors in distance learning to closely monitor the learning process and promptly interevent when needed.

Indexed as

ClusteringDiscussion ForumDistance learningLearning AnalyticsPrincipal Components AnalysisSocial Network Analysis

Identifiers

PMID34602848
PMCPMC8479270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.