Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34602834›Full record

ArticleJournal of agricultural & environmental ethics2021

Minding the Gaps in Fish Welfare: The Untapped Potential of Fish Farm Workers.

Christian Medaas, Marianne E Lien, Kristine Gismervik, Tore S Kristiansen, Tonje Osmundsen, Kristine Vedal Størkersen, Brit Tørud, Lars Helge Stien

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of agricultural & environmental ethics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christian MedaasDepartment of Social Anthropology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9462-8389
Marianne E LienDepartment of Social Anthropology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Kristine GismervikNorwegian Veterinary Institute, Oslo, Norway.
Tore S KristiansenResearch Group Animal Welfare, Institute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway.
Tonje OsmundsenNTNU Social Research, Trondheim, Norway.
Kristine Vedal StørkersenNTNU Social Research, Trondheim, Norway.
Brit TørudNorwegian Veterinary Institute, Oslo, Norway.
Lars Helge StienResearch Group Animal Welfare, Institute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The welfare of farmed fish is often regarded with less concern than the welfare of other husbandry animals, as fish are not universally classified as sentient beings. In Norway, farmed fish and other husbandry animals are legally protected under the same laws. Additionally, the legislature has defined a number of aquaculture-specific amendments, including mandatory welfare courses for fish farmers who have a key role in securing animal welfare, also with regards to noting welfare challenges in the production process. This article uses fish welfare courses as a site from which to inquire about the common-sense understanding of fish welfare in Norwegian fish farming. The focus is specifically on fish farm employees, their experiences of welfare-related issues and contradictions in their daily work, and the struggle to act responsibly in aquaculture settings. Through participant observation at welfare courses, as well as interviews and conversations with fish farm workers, the article details how challenges are experienced 'on the ground', and suggests how fish farm workers' own experiential knowledge might be mobilized to improve the general welfare of farmed fish.

Indexed as

AquacultureNorwayRegulationResponsibilitySalmonWelfare

Identifiers

PMID34602834
PMCPMC8475820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.