Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34602826›Full record

ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2021

Primary Health Care and Hospital Management During COVID-19: Lessons from Lombardy.

Barbara Plagg, Giuliano Piccoliori, Jörg Oschmann, Adolf Engl, Klaus Eisendle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Social determinants of health inequity in Iran: a narrative review.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Early Nurse Management Experiences from Finnish COVID-19 Hubs: An In-Action Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Barbara PlaggInstitute of General Practice and Public Health - College of Health Care Professions Claudiana, Bolzano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6116-7504
Giuliano PiccolioriInstitute of General Practice and Public Health - College of Health Care Professions Claudiana, Bolzano, Italy.
Jörg OschmannInstitute of Cultural and Social Anthropology, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
Adolf EnglInstitute of General Practice and Public Health - College of Health Care Professions Claudiana, Bolzano, Italy.
Klaus EisendleInstitute of General Practice and Public Health - College of Health Care Professions Claudiana, Bolzano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8234-9964

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pandemic due to SARS-CoV-2 tested the resilience of health systems worldwide. The outcome of the pandemic is impacted by health management choices made over the course of the disaster, which in turn are strongly dependent on the underlying healthcare system - as mirrored by the fact that regional pandemic experiences differ considerably: In Italy (a country most impacted by the COVID-19 outbreak), infection and mortality rates vary vastly between regions, with Lombardy - a comparatively well-equipped region with regard to hospitals and centers of scientific excellence - being amongst the worst-affected areas. Within this article, we focus on the challenges within primary health care and hospital organization, cooperation between primary and specialist care, and access to health care services: In Lombardy, neglected primary health care with a comparatively low availability of general practitioners (GPs) per inhabitant, the initial prioritization of hospitals during the pandemic while neglecting primary health care in terms of personal protective equipment (PPE), the lack of testing resources, and a failure to achieve coordinated support contributed to a quick overburdening of hospitals, where the dissolution of traditional departments into "macro-areas" may favor nosocomial infections during an ongoing pandemic. Neither specialized medicine nor privatization, but rather flexible public healthcare services working in consistent cooperation with GPs, show better efficiency in containing viral spread and managing patients. Strengthening the primary health care sector with regard to human and technical resources and supporting the coordination between the different levels of health care providers help to avoid overcrowded hospitals, while protecting patients and health care workers during large-scale health emergencies. Overall, further in-depth analysis of structural determinants is needed in order to develop more-resilient and integrative health care systems.

Indexed as

continuity of careCOVID-19disaster managementintegration of careintensity of care hospitalsprimary health care

Identifiers

PMID34602826
PMCPMC8478667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.