Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34602765›Full record

ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2021

Cervical Cancer Screening: Is the Age Group 30-65 Years Optimum for Screening in Low-Resource Settings?

Ruchika Gupta, Akhileshwar Sharda, Dinesh Kumar, Rajshree Fulzele, Reena Dwivedi, Sanjay Gupta

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ruchika GuptaDivision of Cytopathology, ICMR-National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research, I-7, Sector-39, Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201301 India.ORCID 0000-0003-0235-063X
Akhileshwar ShardaDivision of Cytopathology, ICMR-National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research, I-7, Sector-39, Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201301 India.
Dinesh KumarDivision of Cytopathology, ICMR-National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research, I-7, Sector-39, Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201301 India.
Rajshree FulzeleDivision of Clinical Oncology, ICMR-National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research, I-7, Sector-39, Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201301 India.
Reena DwivediDivision of Clinical Oncology, ICMR-National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research, I-7, Sector-39, Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201301 India.
Sanjay GuptaDivision of Cytopathology, ICMR-National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research, I-7, Sector-39, Noida, Uttar Pradesh 201301 India.
National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn Operational Framework document for population-wide screening of common cancers in India was launched in 2016. The target age for screening is 30-65 years for cervical, breast and oral cancers. This study was designed to review the frequency and distribution of cervical lesions among women aged 21-29, 30-65 and > 65 years. STUDY

designA retrospective review of all satisfactory cervical smears (

resultsOf the 1357 ECAs (1.7% of all smears), about 16.9% were seen in the age band 21-29 years, while 4.5% presented in > 65 years of age. About 80% of the ECAs seen in younger women were low-grade squamous lesions, while 75% of lesions in women > 65 years were high-grade squamous abnormalities. Among the total 512 significant high-grade and malignant (squamous and glandular) lesions, 5.6% presented in women 21-29 years, while 10.1% were seen in > 65 years of age.

conclusionMajority of the significant cervical lesions would be detected if the screening focuses on the 30-65 years age group. However, about 19% of high-grade squamous preneoplastic lesions (ASC-H/ HSIL) and 13% of preneoplastic glandular lesions (AGC-N) are likely to be missed if women 21-29 years and > 65 years are excluded. The cost of screening incurred by including these age groups has to be weighed against the benefits derived, especially in low-resource settings. In the absence of universal implementation of HPV immunization, there is a felt need to enhance cervical cancer awareness and encourage screening, more so in high-risk category and symptomatic females beyond the selected age group.

Indexed as

AgeCervical cancerHigh-grade lesionsLow-resource settingsScreening

Identifiers

PMID34602765
PMCPMC8440710
OpenAlexW3158527876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.