ArticleIndustrial & engineering chemistry research2021
Robust, small diameter hydrophilic nanofibers improve the flux of ultrafiltration membranes.
Article in Industrial & engineering chemistry research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, we systematically investigated the flux performance of ultrafiltration (UF) membranes functionalized with randomly-accumulated nanofibers. By electrospinning nanofibers from hydrophobic polysulfone (PSf) and hydrophilic cellulose (CL), we were able to explore the role that bulk nanofiber (NF) layer thickness, individual NF diameter, and intrinsic chemistry have on composite membrane flux. Additional parameters that we systematically tested include the molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) of the base membrane (10, 100, and 200 kDa), flow orientation (cross-flow versus dead-end), and the feed solution (hydrophilic water versus hydrophobic oil). Structurally, the crosslinked PSf nanofibers were more robust than the CL nanofibers, which lead to the PSfNF-UF membranes having a greater flux performance. To decouple the structural robustness from the water affinity of the fibers, we chemically modified the PSf fibers to be hydrophilic and indeed, the flux of these new composite membranes featuring hydrophilic crosslinked nanofibers were superior. In summary, the greatest increase in flux performance arises from the smallest diameter, hydrophilic nanofibers that are mechanically robust (crosslinked). We have demonstrated that electrospun nanofiber layers improve the flux performance of ultrafiltration membranes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.