Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34602655›Full record

ArticleRemote sensing of environment2021

Downscaling of far-red solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence of different crops from canopy to leaf level using a diurnal data set acquired by the airborne imaging spectrometer HyPlant.

Bastian Siegmann, Maria Pilar Cendrero-Mateo, Sergio Cogliati, Alexander Damm, John Gamon, David Herrera, Christoph Jedmowski, Laura Verena Junker-Frohn, Thorsten Kraska, Onno Muller and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Remote sensing of environment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.

Bastian SiegmannInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences, IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, 52428 Jülich, Germany.
Maria Pilar Cendrero-MateoLaboratory of Earth Observation, Image Processing Laboratory, University of Valencia, C/ Catedrático José Beltrán, 2, 46980 Paterna, Valencia, Spain.
Sergio CogliatiRemote Sensing of Environmental Dynamics Lab., DISAT, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 1, 20126 Milano, Italy.
Alexander DammDepartment of Geography, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
John GamonDepartment of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences and Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, 11335 Saskatchewan Drive, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E3, Canada.
David HerreraInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences, IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, 52428 Jülich, Germany.
Christoph JedmowskiInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences, IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, 52428 Jülich, Germany.
Laura Verena Junker-FrohnInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences, IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, 52428 Jülich, Germany.
Thorsten KraskaField Lab Campus Klein-Altendorf, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Bonn, Campus Klein-Altendorf 1, 53359 Rheinbach, Germany.
Onno MullerInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences, IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, 52428 Jülich, Germany.
Patrick RademskeInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences, IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, 52428 Jülich, Germany.
Christiaan van der TolFaculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Hengelosestraat 99, Enschede, 7500, AE, the Netherlands.
Juan Quiros-VargasInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences, IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, 52428 Jülich, Germany.
Peiqi YangFaculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Hengelosestraat 99, Enschede, 7500, AE, the Netherlands.
Uwe RascherInstitute of Bio- and Geosciences, IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, 52428 Jülich, Germany.
Forschungszentrum Jülich · DEUniversity of Twente · NLParc Científic de la Universitat de València · ESUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Bonn · DEUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · ITUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Remote sensing-based measurements of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) are useful for assessing plant functioning at different spatial and temporal scales. SIF is the most direct measure of photosynthesis and is therefore considered important to advance capacity for the monitoring of gross primary production (GPP) while it has also been suggested that its yield facilitates the early detection of vegetation stress. However, due to the influence of different confounding effects, the apparent SIF signal measured at canopy level differs from the fluorescence emitted at leaf level, which makes its physiological interpretation challenging. One of these effects is the scattering of SIF emitted from leaves on its way through the canopy. The escape fraction (

Indexed as

Diurnal courseFCVIFluorescence correction vegetation indexFluorescence escape fractionHyPlantPhotosynthetically active radiationSIFSolar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence

Identifiers

PMID34602655
PMCPMC8447579
OpenAlexW3187511516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.