Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34602084›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2021

Deep-learning model for screening sepsis using electrocardiography.

Joon-Myoung Kwon, Ye Rang Lee, Min-Seung Jung, Yoon-Ji Lee, Yong-Yeon Jo, Da-Young Kang, Soo Youn Lee, Yong-Hyeon Cho, Jae-Hyun Shin, Jang-Hyeon Ban and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Joon-Myoung Kwon *Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Research Center, Sejong Medical Research Institute, Bucheon, Republic of Korea. kwonjm@sejongh.co.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6754-1010
Ye Rang Lee *Medical Research Team, Medical AI, Co., Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Min-Seung Jung *Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Research Center, Sejong Medical Research Institute, Bucheon, Republic of Korea.
Yoon-Ji LeeArtificial Intelligence and Big Data Research Center, Sejong Medical Research Institute, Bucheon, Republic of Korea.
Yong-Yeon JoArtificial Intelligence and Big Data Research Center, Sejong Medical Research Institute, Bucheon, Republic of Korea.
Da-Young KangMedical Research Team, Medical AI, Co., Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Soo Youn LeeMedical Research Team, Medical AI, Co., Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yong-Hyeon ChoArtificial Intelligence and Big Data Research Center, Sejong Medical Research Institute, Bucheon, Republic of Korea.
Jae-Hyun ShinArtificial Intelligence and Big Data Research Center, Sejong Medical Research Institute, Bucheon, Republic of Korea.
Jang-Hyeon BanMedical R&D Center, Body Friend, Co., Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kyung-Hee KimMedical Research Team, Medical AI, Co., Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sejong Institute · KRSejong General Hospital · KRSeoul Medical Center · KRBio-Medical Science (South Korea) · KR

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2020R1F1A1073791
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction and a major healthcare burden worldwide. Although sepsis is a medical emergency that requires immediate management, screening for the occurrence of sepsis is difficult. Herein, we propose a deep learning-based model (DLM) for screening sepsis using electrocardiography (ECG).

methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 46,017 patients who were admitted to two hospitals. A total of 1,548 and 639 patients had sepsis and septic shock, respectively. The DLM was developed using 73,727 ECGs from 18,142 patients, and internal validation was conducted using 7774 ECGs from 7,774 patients. Furthermore, we conducted an external validation with 20,101 ECGs from 20,101 patients from another hospital to verify the applicability of the DLM across centers.

resultsDuring the internal and external validations, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the DLM using 12-lead ECG was 0.901 (95% confidence interval, 0.882-0.920) and 0.863 (0.846-0.879), respectively, for screening sepsis and 0.906 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.877-0.936) and 0.899 (95% CI, 0.872-0.925), respectively, for detecting septic shock. The AUC of the DLM for detecting sepsis using 6-lead and single-lead ECGs was 0.845-0.882. A sensitivity map revealed that the QRS complex and T waves were associated with sepsis. Subgroup analysis was conducted using ECGs from 4,609 patients who were admitted with an infectious disease, and the AUC of the DLM for predicting in-hospital mortality was 0.817 (0.793-0.840). There was a significant difference in the prediction score of DLM using ECG according to the presence of infection in the validation dataset (0.277 vs. 0.574, p < 0.001), including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (0.260 vs. 0.725, p = 0.018).

conclusionsThe DLM delivered reasonable performance for sepsis screening using 12-, 6-, and single-lead ECGs. The results suggest that sepsis can be screened using not only conventional ECG devices but also diverse life-type ECG machines employing the DLM, thereby preventing irreversible disease progression and mortality.

Indexed as

COVID-19Deep LearningSepsisElectrocardiographyHumansRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Artificial intelligenceDeep learningElectrocardiographyInfectionsSepsisShock, Septic

Identifiers

PMID34602084
PMCPMC8487616
OpenAlexW3127943997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.